Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Mason County

To raise funds to assist other non-profit agencies.

$123k
Granted FY2018
13
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Human Services$146kHousing & Shelter$23kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kEducation$12kHealth$12kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2018 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $118,115 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $123,333 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,218 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k10 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
$6,474
Median grant
1
States reached
$507k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STAIRCASE - YOUTH OUTREACH$23,647
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$15,584
Individual grant recipient$10,000
OAKTREE ACADEMY$9,831
ARC-WSC-DISASTER SERVICES$9,448
SALVATION ARMY - EMERGENCY ASSIST$9,040
COVE - WOMAN'S SHELTER$6,474
LUDINGTON AREA SCHOOLS - OJ DEJON$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,952
ASSOC FOR THE BLIND-VISION REHAB$5,901
SCOTTVILLE SENIOR CENTER - MED TRAN$5,799
J & J MISSION - WOMEN'S JERICHO HOU$5,383
MCC SR MEALS-DELIVERED SENIOR MEALS$5,056
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STAIRCASE - YOUTH OUTREACH: $24k → 10%STAIRCASE - YOUTH OUTREACH: $24k → 10%OAKTREE ACADEMY: $10k → 10%OAKTREE ACADEMY: $10k → 10%COVE - WOMAN'S SHELTER: $6k → 10%COVE - WOMAN'S SHELTER: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$188k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$188k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+69%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SY
    STAIRCASE YOUTH SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $47k · revenue +121%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN
    2× · 2017–2018 · $31k · revenue +9%
  • OA
    OAKTREE ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +129%

Funded once

  • LA
    LUDINGTON AREA SCHOOLS - OJ DEJON
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
2
Habitat for Humanity of Lapeer - Tuscola

To eliminate sub-standard housing and homelessness from lapeer county.

3
Northwest Michigan Rural Housing Partnership

To help provide safe, accessible, and affordable housing in Northwest Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
5
South Oakland Shelter

Lighthouse mi endeavors to build equitable communities and alleviate poverty in partnership with and in service to individuals, families, and organizations.

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County Inc

Seeking to put God's love into action, Habitat for Humanity of Oakland County brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

7
Caring House Inc

To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…

Human Services
8
Oceana County Housing Commission Nonprofit Corporation

The purpose of the oceana county housing commission nonprofit corporation is to provide decent, safe, affordable, and sanitary housing opportunities for low and moderate income residents of oceana county, michigan. the oceana county…

Housing & Shelter
9
House of Hope Midwest

The House of Hope is dedicated to serving individuals, families, and our community by providing a hand up into a hope-filled future.

Human Services
10
Montcalm County Habitat for Humanity

The mission of Montcalm County Habitat for Humanity is to improve lives in our community by building safe and affordable housing in partnership with Gods people.

11
Mahaska County Habitat for Humanity

A nonprofit ecumenical christian housing ministry dedicated to eleminating substandard housing and homelessness worldwide and to making adequate, affordable shelter a matter of conscience and action.

12
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Staircase Youth Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is J & J Mission of Mason County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN — $31,192 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGANTHE SALVATION ARMY - KALAMAZOO — $19,182 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY - KALAMAZOOARC-WSC-DISASTER SERVICES — $19,131 · OtherARC-WSC-DISASTER SERVICESMASON COUNTY CENTRAL SCHOOLS — $16,076 · OtherMASON COUNTY CENTRAL SCHOOLSIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLUDINGTON AREA SCHOOLS - OJ DEJON — $6,000 · OtherLUDINGTON AREA SCHOOLS — $6,000 · OtherHOME TEAM HOUSING — $5,952 · OtherSTAIRCASE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $47,304 · Human ServicesSTAIRCASE YOUTH SERVICES INCOAKTREE ACADEMY INC — $19,782 · Human ServicesOAKTREE ACADEMY INCCOMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCO — $12,300 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCOJ & J MISSION OF MASON COUNTY — $11,355 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $11,901 · Health
Other$113,533Human Services$79,386Housing & Shelter$17,355Health$11,901

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTAIRCASE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $47,304 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN — $31,192 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOAKTREE ACADEMY INC — $19,782 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITIES OVERCOMING VIOLENT ENCO — $12,300 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $11,901 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHOME TEAM HOUSING — $5,952 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Muskegon CountyMI24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Muskegon County · Pennies From Heaven Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Mason County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Way of Mason County?

    Find your warmest path to United Way of Mason County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $82k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph