Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Marshall County - Alabama Inc

Our mission is to improve lives by mobilizing people to care for one another in a voluntary, community-wide effort.

$482k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.0MHealth$526kCrime & Legal$465kHousing & Shelter$339kPublic Safety & Disaster$231kYouth Development$128kCommunity Improvement$73kFood & Nutrition$30k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $454,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $482,010 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,510 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $387k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT$50,000
SHEPHERD'S COVE HOSPICE$43,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES$42,000
MARSHALL CO FOSTER PARENTS ASSOCIATION$40,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$40,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$39,500
CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR AGING$35,500
DEPT OF MENTAL HEALTH - MARSHALL CO ARC$30,000
CAJA$25,000
MARSHALL CO HOME PLACE$21,000
MARSHALL COUNTY HOMELESS MINISTRIES$20,000
MARSHALL COUNTY RSVP$19,000
MARSHALL CO GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM$11,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA$10,500
SHEPHERD'S COVE FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $659k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD RESOURCE NETWORK: $50k → 19%CHILD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 19%CHILD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 19%CHILD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 19%CHILD RESOURCE NETWORK: $50k → 19%CHILD RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $42k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $40k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $40k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $40k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $40k → 17%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $40k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $22k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $21k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $21k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $21k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $21k → 17%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 19 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
0

Total granted

$2.8M
$0

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalCivil RightsHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CHILDCARE RESOURCE NETWORK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $300k · revenue +42%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $270k · revenue +28%
  • DV
    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $242k · revenue +4%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

    Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

    Crime & Legal
    2
    Marshall County Homeless Ministries Inc

    Provide shelter for minister to and educate the homeless

    Housing & Shelter
    3
    Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc

    Interview facility for child abuse victims.

    Human Services
    4
    Marshall County Assn for Exceptional Children Inc

    Provide services to adults with intellectual disabilities and development.

    Human Services
    5
    Robertson County Child Advocacy Cen

    Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.

    Crime & Legal
    6
    Jackson County Children's Advocacy Center

    Child abuse response and prevention through service, education, and leadership

    Crime & Legal
    7
    Marshall County Caring Inc

    Financial assistance to low income

    —
    8
    Marshall-Jackson Mental Health Board Inc

    To promote the health and general welfare of the citizens of marshall and jackson counties and other board approved geographic areas and services by providing a comprehensive program of community based mental health services and facilities…

    Health
    9
    Morgan County Child Advocacy Center

    To provide a safe caring place to evaluate any child who may have been abused

    Crime & Legal
    10
    Warrick County Casa Inc

    To recruit volunteers to represent children

    Crime & Legal
    11
    Third District Guardian Ad Litem Program

    Provide guardian ad litem services in child protection cases for the third judicial district of the state of idaho

    Crime & Legal
    12
    Marshall County Christmas Coalition

    To organize for the collection and distribution of toys and clothing to children of indigent families in the marshall county, alabama area

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocacy Center of Marshall County Alabama Inc; the most unlike its peers is Family Services of North Alabama. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    14/14
    Grantees still filing
    10/14
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    HOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC: $270,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY INCMARSHALL COUNTY FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENTS ASSOCIATION: $240,000 · OtherMARSHALL COUNTY FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE PARENTS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $230,500 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSMARSHALL COUNTY HOMELESS MINISTRIES: $220,750 · OtherMARSHALL COUNTY HOMELESS MINISTRIESCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING HOMEBOUND OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAM: $194,500 · OtherCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING HOMEBOUND OF MARSHALL CO…MARSHALL COUNTY ARC INC: $177,000 · OtherMARSHALL COUNTY ARC INCMARSHALL COUNTY GUARDIANSHIP PROGRAM INC: $63,000 · Other+3 more: $116,000 · Other+3 moreCHILDCARE RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesCHILDCARE RESOURCE NETWORK…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $242,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS S…FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $116,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH A…CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAMA INC: $227,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD ADV…COURT APPOINTED JUVENILE ADVOCACY BOARD OF MARSHALL COUNTY: $143,000 · Civil RightsTHE MARSHALL COUNTY HOME PLACE INC: $118,000 · Housing & ShelterMARSHALL COUNTY RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM INC: $73,000 · Community ImprovementHOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $46,000 · HealthGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $42,000 · Youth Development
    Other$1,511,750Human Services$658,500Crime & Legal$227,000Civil Rights$143,000Housing & Shelter$118,000Community Improvement$73,000Health$46,000Youth Development$42,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDCARE RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $300,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC: $270,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES: $242,000 over 9y, 7.6% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAMA INC: $227,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetCARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING HOMEBOUND OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAM: $194,500 over 9y, 91% of budgetMARSHALL COUNTY ARC INC: $177,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED JUVENILE ADVOCACY BOARD OF MARSHALL COUNTY: $143,000 over 9y, 17% of budgetTHE MARSHALL COUNTY HOME PLACE INC: $118,000 over 9y, 5.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA: $116,500 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetMARSHALL COUNTY RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM INC: $73,000 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $48,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $46,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA: $42,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CHILDCARE RESOURCE NETWORK INC ↗
    • Who funds HOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC ↗
    • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS SERVICES ↗
    • Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAMA INC ↗
    • Who funds CARE ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR THE AGING HOMEBOUND OF MARSHALL COUNTY ALABAM ↗
    • Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY ARC INC ↗
    • Who funds COURT APPOINTED JUVENILE ADVOCACY BOARD OF MARSHALL COUNTY ↗
    • Who funds THE MARSHALL COUNTY HOME PLACE INC ↗
    • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA ↗
    • Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM INC ↗
    • Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
    • Who funds HOSPICE OF MARSHALL COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    United Givers Fund of Dekalb CountyAL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: United Givers Fund of Dekalb County · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization United Way of Marshall County - Alabama Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Marshall County - Alabama Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on United Way of Marshall County - Alabama’s filings →

      More from the funding graph