Skip to content
United Way of Leavenworth County Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Leavenworth County Inc

We unite individuals, nonprofits, businesses, and government partners to fight for the education, basic needs, and financial stability of each and every person in the leavenworth county area.

$77k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Human Services$55kHealth$32kCrime & Legal$29kArts & Culture$23kFood & Nutrition$8kRecreation & Sports$7k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $45,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $76,550 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $31,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$246k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST JUDICIAL CASA$10,000
RICHARD ALLEN CULTURAL CENTER$10,000
SAINT VINCENT CLINIC$10,000
WOMEN'S COMUNITY Y$10,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NE KANSAS$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BASEHOR-LINWOOD ASSISTANCE SERVICES: $6k → 10%WOMEN'S COMUNITY Y: $16k → 10%WOMEN'S COMUNITY Y: $10k → 10%LEAVENWORTH MISSION COMMUNITY STORE: $8k → 10%ALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY VIOLANCE: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 5 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$114k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+42%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WOMENS COMMUNITY Y
    2× · 2021–2022 · $26k · revenue +1%
  • SV
    SAINT VINCENT CLINIC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k
  • FJ
    First Judicial District CASA Association
    2× · 2021–2022 · $23k · revenue -44%

Funded once

  • LM
    LEAVENWORTH MISSION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -28%
  • TT
    TEAM TONGIE
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS KANSAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Casa Association Inc

To provide fundraising & administrative assistance to casa organizations throughout the state of kansas

Crime & Legal
2
Central Kansas Court Appointed Special Advocates

Provides a voice for abused and neglected children who are under the legal protection of the court system

Civil Rights
3
North Central Kansas Casa Inc

The mission of casa is to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in the courts. casa promotes and supports quality volunteer representation for children in order to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing…

Crime & Legal
4
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
5
Lawrence Community Shelter Inc

The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…

Housing & Shelter
6
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
7
Assistance League of Kansas City

Assistance league of kansas city is dedicated to alleviating the consequences of poverty or crisis for children and adults in the greater kansas city community

—
8
Volunteer Kansas Inc

To promote volunteerism and grant opportunties in the state of kansas

Arts & Culture
9
Children's Advocacy Centers of Kansas Inc

The children's advocacy center of kansas (cacks) is committed to securing appropriate resources for ensuring the healthy establishment and sustainability of kansas child advocacy centers and the kansas chapter. cacks is committed to…

Youth Development
10
Tri-County Casa Inc

Tri-county casa, inc. volunteers advocate for children in the 13th judicial district in butler, greenwood, and elk counties in kansas.

Civil Rights
11
Casa of Johnson County Inc

Recruit and train community volunteers to speak out for abused and neglected children in court proceedings so that they can be permanently placed in a safe, nuturing enviroment as quickly as possible.

Crime & Legal
12
Casa of North Arkansas

The organization and its volunteers serve as advocates for abused and neglected children.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Northeast Kansas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Richard Allen Cultural Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT VINCENT CLINIC: $25,000 · OtherSAINT VINCENT CLINICCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC: $17,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS I…TEAM TONGIE: $7,040 · OtherTEAM TONGIESALVATION ARMY: $6,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYWOMENS COMMUNITY Y: $26,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS COMMUNITY YLEAVENWORTH MISSION INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesLEAVENWORTH MISSION INCALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE INCORPORATED: $6,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE …BASEHOR LINWOOD ASSISTANCE SERVICES INC: $5,600 · Human ServicesBASEHOR LINWOOD ASSISTANCE SERVIC…First Judicial District CASA Association: $23,000 · Civil RightsFirst Judicial Di…RICHARD ALLEN CULTURAL CENTER INC: $22,500 · Arts & CultureRICHARD ALLEN CU…SPECIAL OLYMPICS KANSAS INC: $7,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$55,040Human Services$45,100Civil Rights$23,000Arts & Culture$22,500Recreation & Sports$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMENS COMMUNITY Y: $26,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetFirst Judicial District CASA Association: $23,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NORTHEAST KANSAS INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEAVENWORTH MISSION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS KANSAS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE INCORPORATED: $6,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Commerce Bancshares F…Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Leavenworth County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Leavenworth County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Leavenworth County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home