Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Jackson County

UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY (uwjc) is dedicated to creating a community rich in opportunities to eliminate poverty and allow all people to achieve financial stability and success.

$6.3M
Granted FY2022
16
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$48k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$747kHousing & Shelter$564kYouth Development$368kCrime & Legal$293kEducation$262kRecreation & Sports$143kCommunity Improvement$121kHealth$106kOther$0
02FY2022 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $301,108, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,330,641 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,029,533 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $284k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY SERVICES AND FAMILY AID$48,188
LEGAL SERVICES OF SOUTH EAST MICHIG$48,019
AWARE$40,912
LILLY MISSIONS CENTER$36,938
NONPROFIT NETWORK$18,750
CHILD CARE NETWORK$16,500
JACKSON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$15,000
JACKSON HOUSING COMMISSION$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
DOCHASS II$10,000
JACKSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
JOHN GEORGE HOME$10,000
FELICIAN CHILDRENS CENTER$10,000
COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$7,988
FOOD BANK OF SC MICHIGAN$5,063
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $585k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $73k → 14%NONPROFIT NETWORK: $27k → 13%NONPROFIT NETWORK: $24k → 13%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $50k → 14%NONPROFIT NETWORK: $24k → 13%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $45k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $45k → 14%CHILD CARE NETWORK: $17k → 14%NONPROFIT NETWORK: $19k → 13%JOHN GEORGE HOME: $16k → 13%JOHN GEORGER HOME: $10k → 13%JOHN GEORGE HOME: $10k → 13%JOHN GEORGER HOME: $9k → 13%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $47k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $35k → 13%JOHN GEORGER HOME: $9k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $32k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $32k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $27k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $8k → 13%NONPROFIT NETWORK: $27k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 17 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +82% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$2.6M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+57%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    Michigan Advocacy Program
    6× · 2017–2022 · $293k · revenue +194%
  • AI
    Aware Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $286k · revenue +48%
  • CC
    Child Care Network
    6× · 2017–2022 · $230k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CC
    Catholic Charities of Jacksongraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $47k · revenue +57%
  • JC
    JACKSON COUNTY INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $32k
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS - IRISH HILLS
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jackson Interfaith Shelter

Seeking to put Gods love into action, Jackson Interfaith Shelter provides temporary shelter and other essential resources to people experiencing homelessness and poverty.

Housing & Shelter
2
Jackson Resource Center

To be a multifaceted housing organization devoted to catalyzing intentional on and off site collaborative partnerships that reduces homelessness and creates sustainable communities through affordable quality housing continued education job…

Education
3
Jackson County Casa

Casa is a unique non-profit helping abused and neglected children in the jackson county family court system. our team of trained volunteers,staff case supervisors, and staff attorneys allow each child to be represented in a court of law…

Civil Rights
4
Jackson Community Ambulance

The mission of jackson community ambulance is to provide high-quality out-of-hospital care and transportation services to the communities we serve.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Jackson Family Childcare

To provide high quality, comprehensive child development and after school care to ensure that children can reach their highest potential

—
6
St Johns Community Center

to provide food and shelter for the homeless of Detroit

—
7
Jackson Community Development Corp

Our vision is to seek the wholistic wellbeing of the Jackson neighborhood, where residents are known, valued, and empowered to collaborate for the thriving of its people and place.

Community Improvement
8
Jackson County Community Services Consortium

Enhance delivery of quality, integrated, accessible services

—
9
Jackson Council on the Aging Inc

The primary function of the Jackson Council on the Aging, Inc. is to improve the quality of life for the parish's elderly and to provide services to the elderly as well as coordinate and monitor the services of other local agencies serving…

—
10
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
11
Jackson County Child Abuse Task Force Dba Childrens Advocacy Center

To meet the needs of children and famlies in our community by providing a community-based, child-focused center that facilitates a compassionate, multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, treatment, identification, investigation, and…

—
12
Jackson County Chamber of Commerce

To be a leading driver and advocate for community and economic development in jackson county.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Jackson County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Do'chas Ii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY SERVICES AND FAMILY AID: $489,488 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES AND FAMILY AIDLIFEWAYS COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $174,578 · OtherLIFEWAYS COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTHBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $142,750 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JACKSON COUNTY INCTHE SALVATION ARMY - KALAMAZOO: $130,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY - KALAMAZOOCOUNTY OF JACKSON MICHIGAN DEPT ON AGING: $106,333 · OtherCOUNTY OF JACKSON MICHIGAN DEPT ON AGINGJACKSON HOUSING COMMISSION: $94,000 · OtherJACKSON HOUSING COMMISSIONSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $75,063 · OtherSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK+4 more: $121,511 · Other+4 moreAware Inc: $285,878 · Human ServicesAware IncChild Care Network: $229,833 · Human ServicesChild Care NetworkLILY MISSIONS CENTER: $154,271 · Human ServicesLILY MISSIONS CENTERCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $133,321 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYNONPROFIT NETWORK: $121,017 · Human ServicesNONPROFIT NETWORKJOHN GEORGE HOME INC: $54,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Jackson: $47,303 · Human ServicesMichigan Advocacy Program: $292,686 · Crime & LegalMichigan Ad…Jackson Community Foundation: $66,000 · PhilanthropyDO'CHAS II: $57,675 · Youth DevelopmentJackson School of the Arts Assoc: $9,761 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,333,723Human Services$1,025,623Crime & Legal$292,686Philanthropy$66,000Youth Development$57,675Arts & Culture$9,761

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMichigan Advocacy Program: $292,686 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetAware Inc: $285,878 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetChild Care Network: $229,833 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetLILY MISSIONS CENTER: $154,271 over 6y, 24% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $142,750 over 6y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $133,321 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNONPROFIT NETWORK: $121,017 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $75,063 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJackson Community Foundation: $66,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDO'CHAS II: $57,675 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetJOHN GEORGE HOME INC: $54,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCatholic Charities of Jackson: $47,303 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE JACKSON FRIENDLY HOME: $44,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetST JOSEPH HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $32,400 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetJackson School of the Arts Assoc: $9,761 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Michigan Advocacy Program ↗
  • Who funds Aware Inc ↗
  • Who funds Child Care Network ↗
  • Who funds LILY MISSIONS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds NONPROFIT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Jackson Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DO'CHAS II ↗
  • Who funds JOHN GEORGE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Jackson ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON FRIENDLY HOME ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Jackson School of the Arts Assoc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jackson Community FoundationMI34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jackson Community Foundation · United Way of South Central Michigan · Consumers Energy Foundation · The Alvin L Glick Foundation · Lavery Foundation · John George Jr Paragraph X Trust · Louis Glick Memorial & Charitable Trust · The Hurst Foundation · Speckhard-Knight Charitable Foundation · Lenawee Community Foundation · Flagstar Foundation Inc · Macchia Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Jackson County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Jackson County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Jackson County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph