Skip to content
United Way of Greater Baytown Area and Chambers County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Greater Baytown Area and Chambers County

As a human service leader, uwgbacc supports initiatives and programs that address community wide issues to lift the overall quality of life in the region.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$181k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.8MFood & Nutrition$2.7MHuman Services$2.7MHousing & Shelter$2.1MYouth Development$2.0MCrime & Legal$1.4MEducation$1.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$167kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEARTS AND HANDS OF BAYTOWN$180,780
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$162,000
BRIDGEHAVEN CHILDRENS ADVOCACY$132,204
LOVE NETWORK OF BAYTOWN$120,690
BAY AREA HOMELESS SERVICES$115,170
CHAMBERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS$96,290
BAYTOWN MEALS ON WHEELS$90,250
DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER$75,000
BAY AREA REHABILITATION CENTER$66,000
CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER$49,500
COASTAL GATEWAY HEALTH CENTER$46,166
BAY AREA TURNING POINT$35,000
FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF GALVESTON$32,000
BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS$26,200
GIRL SCOUTS$24,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CASA OF CHAMBERSLIBERTY COUNTY: $48k → 20%CASA OF CHAMBERSLIBERTY COUNTY: $29k → 20%CASA OF CHAMBERSLIBERTY COUNTY: $24k → 20%CASA OF CHAMBERSLIBERTY COUNTY: $23k → 20%CASA OF CHAMBERSLIBERTY COUNTY: $19k → 20%CASA OF CHAMBERSLIBERTY COUNTY: $17k → 20%BAYTOWN FAMILY YMCA: $106k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER BAYTOWN: $93k → 16%CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER: $90k → 16%CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER: $88k → 16%CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER: $87k → 16%BAYTOWN FAMILY YMCA: $87k → 16%CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER: $86k → 16%CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER: $76k → 16%BAYTOWN FAMILY YMCA: $75k → 16%CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER: $55k → 16%CHURCH WOMEN CHILD CARE CENTER: $50k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE CENTER OF GALVESTON: $32k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $93k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $78k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER HOUSTON: $54k → 16%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $146k → 16%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $136k → 16%COLLABORATIUVE FOR CHILDREN: $120k → 16%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $119k → 16%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $98k → 16%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $87k → 16%COLLABORATIVE FOR CHILDREN: $83k → 16%TALENT YIELD COALITION: $45k → 16%TALENT YIELD COALITION: $35k → 16%TALENT YIELD COALITION: $35k → 16%TALENT YIELD COALITION: $31k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $162k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $100k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $100k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $88k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $83k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $75k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $72k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $70k → 16%DEPELCHIN CHILDRENS CENTER: $65k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 27 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
1

Total granted

$15M
$11k

Still filing today

81%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    Bay Area Homeless Services Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +23% · 35% of their budget
  • CI
    Communities in Schools of Baytown Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +65%
  • BM
    BAYTOWN MEALS ON WHEELS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +32% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • O
    OTHER
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
2
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
3
South Central Houston Action Council Inc

The organization provides medical services in the form of primary and preventive care to underserved and underinsured residents of harris county.

—
4
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
5
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
6
Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc

Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.

Civil Rights
7
Community Action Corporation of South Texas

To continuously improve the lives of South Texans by providing high quality health care, education, housing and economic opportunities to reduce poverty through services and partnerships.

Human Services
8
United Way of Brazoria County

To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County

Philanthropy
9
Womens Center of Brazoria County Inc

Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims

Human Services
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
11
Resource & Crisis Center of Galveston County Texas

The mission of the Resource & Crisis Center of Galveston County, Inc. is to promote the safety, well-being and best interests of victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, and human trafficking and to advocate for the…

Human Services
12
Montgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Serves abused children through a comprehensive approach to services for abused children and their families.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc; the most unlike its peers is Coastal Gateway Health Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Love Network of Baytown: $1,159,043 · Human ServicesLove Network of BaytownDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $815,449 · Human ServicesDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTERCollaborative for Children: $787,787 · Human ServicesCollaborative for ChildrenYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $585,794 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association o…CHURCH WOMEN UNITED-CHILD CARE CENT: $531,599 · Human ServicesCHURCH WOMEN UNITED-CHILD CARE CENTBay Area Turning Point Inc: $289,478 · Human ServicesBay Area Turning Point IncTHE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $207,588 · Human ServicesCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES CASA OF LIBERTY/CHAMBERS COUNTIES: $159,451 · Human Services+2 more: $177,890 · Human ServicesBay Area Homeless Services Inc: $1,813,726 · OtherBay Area Homeless Services IncBAY AREA REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,310,321 · OtherBAY AREA REHABILITATION CENTERBaytown Resource & Assistance Center: $916,303 · OtherBaytown Resource & Assistance Cente…BAYTOWN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $274,520 · OtherBAYTOWN HABITAT FOR HUMANITYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $166,912 · Other+4 more: $207,947 · OtherCommunities in Schools of Baytown Inc: $1,429,313 · EducationCommunitie…BRIDGEHAVEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,029,620 · Crime & LegalHOUSTON VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC: $75,751 · Crime & LegalBAYTOWN MEALS ON WHEELS: $1,029,847 · Food & NutritionHearts and Hands of Baytown Inc: $766,466 · ReligionINTERFAITH CAREPARTNERS INC: $36,416 · ReligionUNLIMITED VISIONS AFTERCARE INC: $597,269 · HealthCOASTAL GATEWAY HEALTH CENTER: $106,582 · HealthCHAMBERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $96,290 · HealthGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council: $271,052 · Youth DevelopmentBoy Scouts of America Sam Houston Area Council: $91,609 · Youth Development
Human Services$4,714,079Other$4,689,729Education$1,429,313Crime & Legal$1,105,371Food & Nutrition$1,029,847Religion$802,882Health$800,141Youth Development$362,661

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBay Area Homeless Services Inc: $1,813,726 over 9y, 35% of budgetCommunities in Schools of Baytown Inc: $1,429,313 over 9y, 18% of budgetBAY AREA REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,310,321 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetLove Network of Baytown: $1,159,043 over 9y, 57% of budgetBAYTOWN MEALS ON WHEELS: $1,029,847 over 9y, 34% of budgetBRIDGEHAVEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,029,620 over 8y, 15% of budgetBaytown Resource & Assistance Center: $916,303 over 4y, 73% of budgetDEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $815,449 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCollaborative for Children: $787,787 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetHearts and Hands of Baytown Inc: $766,466 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetUNLIMITED VISIONS AFTERCARE INC: $597,269 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $585,794 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHURCH WOMEN UNITED-CHILD CARE CENT: $531,599 over 7y, 31% of budgetBay Area Turning Point Inc: $289,478 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBAYTOWN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $274,520 over 8y, 18% of budgetGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council: $271,052 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC: $207,588 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES CASA OF LIBERTY/CHAMBERS COUNTIES: $159,451 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetTALENT YIELD COALITION INC: $145,890 over 4y, 59% of budgetCOASTAL GATEWAY HEALTH CENTER: $106,582 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCHAMBERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $96,290 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBoy Scouts of America Sam Houston Area Council: $91,609 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSTON VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC: $75,751 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetProject GRAD Houston: $66,328 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetINTERFAITH CAREPARTNERS INC: $36,416 over 3y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Bay Area Homeless Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds Communities in Schools of Baytown Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Love Network of Baytown ↗
  • Who funds BAYTOWN MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEHAVEN CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Baytown Resource & Assistance Center ↗
  • Who funds DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Collaborative for Children ↗
  • Who funds Hearts and Hands of Baytown Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNLIMITED VISIONS AFTERCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH WOMEN UNITED-CHILD CARE CENT ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Turning Point Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAYTOWN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of San Jacinto Council ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES CASA OF LIBERTY/CHAMBERS COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds TALENT YIELD COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL GATEWAY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHAMBERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Boy Scouts of America Sam Houston Area Council ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON VOLUNTEER LAWYERS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Project GRAD Houston ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH CAREPARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Service Center of Galveston County Texas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…The Moody FoundationShell USA Company Fou…Greater Houston Commu…Celanese FoundationAstros FoundationAlbert & Ethel Herzst…The Brown Foundation …The Houston Food BankHarry S & Isabel C Ca…Houston Endowment IncCharities Aid Foundat…
United Way of Greater HoustonTX21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Houston · The Moody Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Celanese Foundation · Astros Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Houston Food Bank · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Houston Endowment Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Greater Baytown Area and Chambers County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Greater Baytown Area and Chambers County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Greater Baytown Area and Chambers County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home