Skip to content
United Way of Fayette County at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Way of Fayette County

The mission of the UNITED WAY OF FAYETTE COUNTY, inc.

$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$116kHuman Services$106kCommunity Improvement$41kHealth$38kReligion$13kEducation$7kYouth Development$7kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $54k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Remaining grants under 5000$40,549
Rose Avenue Community Center$13,000
Community Action Commission of Fayette County$9,000
Commission on Aging$7,000
Second Chance Center of Hope$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Fayette Co YMCA: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$221k · 7 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -1% since the first grant, against -56% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$221k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
-56%

Still filing today

14%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    ROSE AVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $89k
  • CO
    CAC OF FAYETTE COUNTY
    2× · 2019–2023 · $39k
  • TW
    THE WELL AT SUNNYSIDE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $35k · revenue -65%

Funded once

  • HC
    Health Care Help Fund
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • CO
    Children Offered Resources Early
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • PY
    PLANET YOUTH
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -119%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/7
Grantees still filing
1/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROSE AVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $89,059 · OtherROSE AVE COMMUNITY CENTER INCRemaining grants under 5000: $40,549 · OtherRemaining grants under 5000CAC OF FAYETTE COUNTY: $39,250 · OtherCAC OF FAYETTE COUNTYTHE WELL AT SUNNYSIDE: $34,875 · OtherTHE WELL AT SUNNYSIDELIFE PREGNANCY CENTER: $20,412 · OtherLIFE PREGNANCY CENTERHERITAGE MEMORIAL CHURCH: $13,250 · OtherROCK-A-BYE DAY CARE: $13,000 · OtherFAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $11,500 · OtherHealth Care Help Fund: $11,188 · Other+8 more: $53,676 · Other+8 moreFAYETTE COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN: $6,500 · Human Services
Other$326,759Human Services$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROSE AVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $89,059 over 8y, 7.4% of budgetTHE WELL AT SUNNYSIDE: $34,875 over 3y, 19% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING: $11,500 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF FAYETTE COUNTY: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANET YOUTH: $7,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROSE AVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WELL AT SUNNYSIDE ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF FAYETTE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PLANET YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY FAMILY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ↗
  • Who funds FAYETTE COUNTY - OHIO - SOCIETY FOR THE DISABLED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Young William H Trust
Young William H TrustOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Young William H Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Fayette County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Fayette County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Fayette County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home