Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Eastern Nm

Improving lives in curry, roosevelt, quay, & de baca counties through programs, grants, and activities that strengthen communities especially through programs that support child well-being and youth success.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$335kHuman Services$195kHousing & Shelter$102kCrime & Legal$79kHealth$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kRecreation & Sports$18kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
$19,700
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO$29,970
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ROOSEVELT & CURRY COUNTIES$26,000
ARISE SEXUAL SERVICES$20,400
HARTLEY HOUSE$19,700
CRSMA$9,700
TUCUMCARI SENIOR CENTER$8,500
FT SUMNER SENIOR CENTER$7,855
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $183k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%HARTLEY HOUSE: $46k → 18%HARTLEY HOUSE: $38k → 18%Hartley House: $37k → 18%HARTLEY HOUSE: $35k → 18%HARTLEY HOUSE: $20k → 18%HARTLEY HOUSE: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$759k · 11 repeat orgs$111k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
5

Total granted

$759k
$95k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO
    6× · 2019–2024 · $222k · revenue +16%
  • TH
    THE HARTLEY HOUSE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $183k · revenue +49%
  • CM
    CLOVIS MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $54k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $69k
  • PM
    PORTALES MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • EN
    EASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Habitat for Humanity of Taos Inc

Habitat for humanity of taos invites people of all backgrounds, races, and religions to build houses together in partnership with families in need.

—
2
Home Meal Service Inc

To provide meals to elderly, ill and disabled persons whom are unable to manage their own nutritional needs

Food & Nutrition
3
Meals on Wheels New Mexico

Delivering healthy meals and friendship neighbor to neighbor. The Organization cooks, prepares, and delivers meals to hungry people across New Mexico and provides contact with these people to ensure that their dietary health and other…

Food & Nutrition
4
Habitat for Humanity of the San Juans

Provide affordable housing to the disadvantaged

Housing & Shelter
5
Northwest New Mexico Seniors Inc

Senior citizens meals and activities services.

Human Services
6
Habitat for Humanity of Rutland County Inc

Provide affordable housing for low-income individuals and families.

Housing & Shelter
7
Rockwall Area Habitat for Humanity Inc

Provide homes for families in need.

—
8
Silver Horizons New Mexico Inc

Silver Horizon's mission is to see low-income seniors living safe and secure, in their own homes, with enough food to eat.

Human Services
9
Roswell Homeless Coalition Inc

Providing services for the homeless in roswell nm. this includes temporary housing services, health services and food services. the services are for men, women and children in need.

Housing & Shelter
10
New Mexico Housing & Community Development Corporation

The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…

Housing & Shelter
11
Rio Grande Habitat for Humanityinc

Provide homes for low income families

—
12
Habitat for Humanity Greater Wenatchee Area

Our mission is to provide decent and affordable housing to eligible families in partnership with god, the families and our community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Albuquerque Habitat for Humanity; the most unlike its peers is Curry Resident Senior Meals Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $68,798 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ROOSEVELT AND CURRY COUNTIES: $67,844 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ROOSEVELT AND CURRY CO…CLOVIS MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $54,465 · OtherCLOVIS MEALS ON WHEELS INCThe Oasis Children's Advocacy Center: $52,116 · OtherThe Oasis Children's Advocacy CenterTHE SALVATION ARMY: $29,298 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYRoosevelt General Hospital: $26,536 · OtherRoosevelt General HospitalSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC: $17,612 · Other+6 more: $42,519 · Other+6 moreFOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO: $221,550 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICOCurry Resident Senior Meals Assoc: $35,925 · Food & NutritionCurry Resident Senior Meals AssocTHE HARTLEY HOUSE: $182,959 · Human ServicesTHE HARTLEY HOUSEARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $36,503 · HealthGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $33,950 · Housing & Shelter
Other$359,188Food & Nutrition$257,475Human Services$182,959Health$36,503Housing & Shelter$33,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO: $221,550 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HARTLEY HOUSE: $182,959 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ROOSEVELT AND CURRY COUNTIES: $67,844 over 4y, 17% of budgetCLOVIS MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $54,465 over 4y, 23% of budgetARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $36,503 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $33,950 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC: $17,612 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds THE HARTLEY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF ROOSEVELT AND CURRY COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds CLOVIS MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Eastern Nm funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Eastern Nm. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Eastern Nm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph