Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Central Kansas Inc

United way improves lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities around the world to advance the common good.

$99k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$546kCrime & Legal$73kHealth$47kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $85,350, the rows itemized in this filing. The $99,294 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,944 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $71k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$259k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY CRISIS CENTER$22,000
ELDERCARE$12,750
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$12,000
SALVATION ARMY SERVICE EXTENSION$12,000
GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER$12,000
VOLUNTEERS IN ACTION$9,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF KANSAS$5,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $12k → 12%CARING HANDS DAYCARE: $5k → 15%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $11k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $10k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $8k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $7k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $7k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $6k → 12%GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $19k → 14%ELDERCARE: $15k → 14%ELDERCARE: $14k → 14%GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $13k → 14%GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $13k → 14%ELDERCARE: $13k → 14%GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $12k → 14%GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $12k → 14%GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $12k → 14%GREAT BEND CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER: $12k → 14%ELDERCARE: $11k → 14%ELDERCARE: $11k → 14%ELDERCARE: $10k → 14%ELDERCARE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$685k · 9 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$685k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%
+59%

Still filing today

44%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $164k · revenue +54%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $97k
  • GB
    GREAT BEND CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue -36%

Funded once

  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue -11%
  • SR
    St Rose Health Center
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k
  • CK
    Central Kansas Court Appointed Special Advocatesgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +146%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Clair County Child Advocacy Center

To provide a coordinated, child focused, multi-disciplinary response to child sexual and serious physical abuse in st clair, monroe, and randolph counties.

Crime & Legal
2
Family Support Center of the Uintah Basin Inc

Child respite and child abuse prevention.

—
3
Dekalb County Children's Advocacy Center Inc

Prevent/intervene in child abuse situations

Crime & Legal
4
Quality Care Services Inc

Provide usda meals to qualified daycare centers

Food & Nutrition
5
Child Advocacy Center

To combat child sexual and physical abuse by providing services to children and families in a safe enviroment.

Human Services
6
Children's Advocacy Centers of Kansas Inc

The children's advocacy center of kansas (cacks) is committed to securing appropriate resources for ensuring the healthy establishment and sustainability of kansas child advocacy centers and the kansas chapter. cacks is committed to…

Youth Development
7
Western Kansas Child Advocacy Center

The mission of the Western Kansas Child Advocacy Center (WKCAC) is to heal the trauma of abuse to children and adults through prevention, support and services. Our vision is to ensure that every child and adult has access to trauma-focused…

Crime & Legal
8
Community Children's Center Inc

Provides education and medical assistance to underpriveleged children ages 3-5 in the lawrence kansas area

Education
9
Rusk County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To prevent, treat, and reduce the trauma of the investigative process for child abuse victims and their non-offending family members.

Crime & Legal
10
Child Care Services of Sterling Inc

Provide daycare services for children from newborn to school age

Human Services
11
North Central Kansas Casa Inc

The mission of casa is to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in the courts. casa promotes and supports quality volunteer representation for children in order to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing…

Crime & Legal
12
Kid's Korner Day Care Center Inc

To provide an environment to set up children for success.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Cerebral Palsy of Kansas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Great Bend Child Day Care Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $164,310 · OtherFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCSALVATION ARMY: $97,200 · OtherSALVATION ARMYBARTON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $76,076 · OtherBARTON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGECHILD ABUSE PREVENTION EDUCATION: $41,905 · OtherCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION EDUCATIONUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF KANSAS INC: $41,440 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF KANSAS INCBarton County: $26,380 · OtherBarton CountyGREAT BEND CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION: $93,896 · Human ServicesGREAT BEND CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATIONElderCare Inc: $82,076 · Human ServicesElderCare IncCatholic Charities of Southwest Kansas: $62,050 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Southwest Kansas+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentSt Rose Health Center: $6,000 · HealthCentral Kansas Court Appointed Special Advocates: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$447,311Human Services$243,022Youth Development$10,000Health$6,000Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $164,310 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetGREAT BEND CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION: $93,896 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetElderCare Inc: $82,076 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCatholic Charities of Southwest Kansas: $62,050 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION EDUCATION: $41,905 over 5y, 98% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF KANSAS INC: $41,440 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSt Rose Health Center: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Kansas Court Appointed Special Advocates: $5,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetCARING HANDS DAYCARE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT BEND CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ElderCare Inc ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Southwest Kansas ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds St Rose Health Center ↗
  • Who funds Central Kansas Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
  • Who funds CARING HANDS DAYCARE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Golden Belt Community FoundationKS22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Golden Belt Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Central Kansas Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Central Kansas Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Central Kansas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph