· Public charity
United Union of Roofers Waterproofers and Allied Workers
International labor union
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 45% of UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $98,750 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $144,836 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $46,086 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE | $52,750 |
| ROOFERS LOCAL UNION 189 | $30,000 |
| CMRAVE | $8,500 |
| CHICAGO ROOFERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- USUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE9× · 2017–2025 · $433k · revenue +6%
- UUUNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS 189 RDWA9× · 2017–2025 · $270k · revenue +15%
- UUUNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL 963× · 2019–2021 · $88k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- RUROOFER'S UNION LOCAL #70one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +3%
- UUUNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL 75one grant, 2017 · $17k · revenue -1%
- UUUNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION #135one grant, 2017 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To serve the interest of members and to encourage members to improve working condition and protect them from unjust and unfair labor practice.
The organization represents its members in labor negotiations with the united union of roofers, waterproofers and allied workers local union 30.
Collective bargaining representation on behalf of members.
Labor union
Union purposes include negotiating fair wages, safe working conditions, job protection and education of its members. membership consists of journeymen and apprentices of the plumbing and pipefitting industry.
Representing members in matters of collective bargaining.
Members are represented to further work in a safe and fair workplace for a negotiated wage.
The organization is a trade union that represents operating engineers, who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics,and surveyors in the construction industry, and stationary engineers, who work in operations and maintenance in…
A membership organization providing training, leadership and support for local labor union members.
Labor union
The Union and its employees work for the benefit of its membership including negotiations of wages, benefits and working conditions.
The local union acts as the collective bargaining agent for its members
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Union of Roofers Local 106 and the most unlike its peers is Center for Military Recruitment Assessment and Veterans Employment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS 189 RDWA ↗
- Who funds UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL 96 ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO ROOFERS AND WATERPROOFERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT ↗
- Who funds ROOFER'S UNION LOCAL #70 ↗
- Who funds KALKREUTH ROOFING CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOF AND ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL 182 ↗
- Who funds UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL 75 ↗
- Who funds UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION #135 ↗
- Who funds UNITED UNION OF ROOFERS LOCAL 106 ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Union of Roofers Waterproofers and Allied Workers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.