Skip to content

· Public charity

United States Rugby Foundation

Usrf promotes amateur rugby football throughout the usa by making grants and awards, sponsoring programs for youth development, and by operating the us rugby hall of fame.

$232k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Recreation & Sports$267kEducation$47kArts & Culture$29k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $121,667, the rows itemized in this filing. The $231,857 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $110,190 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USA YOUTH & HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY$45,000
USA RUGBY$20,000
USA YOUTH & HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY$16,000
GIRLS RUGBY INC$10,000
RUGBY WASHINGTON$10,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$7,500
RUGBY LA$6,667
ELLENSBURG YOUTH RUGBY$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY: $10k → 10%MIT Rugby Football Club: $11k → 8%Twin Cities Amazons: $19k → 7%THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $8k → 22%Bennett Gallery Inc: $29k → 8%Julian Arteaga: $6k → 11%USA YOUTH & HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY: $45k → 16%RUGBY WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%GIRLS RUGBY INC: $23k → 12%Crusaders Limited Partnership: $16k → 9%MLR Atlanta LLC: $9k → 14%USA RUGBY: $20k → 12%ELLENSBURG YOUTH RUGBY: $7k → 11%Western Washington University: $9k → 12%Twin Cities Amazons: $8k → 7%USA YOUTH & HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY: $25k → 16%GIRLS RUGBY INC: $10k → 12%USA RUGBY: $10k → 12%Chuckanut Bay Athletic Assoc: $40k → 12%USA YOUTH & HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY: $16k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
DE
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 4 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$176k
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+119%

Still filing today

75%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Recreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UY
    USA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $86k · revenue +46%
  • GR
    Girls Rugby Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $33k · revenue +85%
  • US
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTD
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • CB
    CHUCKANUT BAY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +31%
  • BG
    Bennett Gallery Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $29k
  • CL
    Crusaders Limited Partnership
    one grant, 2021 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Scyr Inc

To govern youth and high school rugby in Southern California, including organizing and running league competitions and tournaments, promoting the continued growth of the game through outreach and education, and prioritizing the safety and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Herriman Rugby
Philanthropy
3
Usa Rugby Charitable Foundation Dba Usa Rugby Trust

To support, promote, develop and grow the sport of rugby at all levels in the united states by providing financial support to usa rugby.

—
4
Albany Knickerbocker Rugby Football Club Inc

The Albany Knickerbockers Rugby Football Club was established in 1973. Building off a strong foundation begun by the clubs founders, the club eventually advanced to field a competitive Division I Men's side. The success of the club…

Recreation & Sports
5
Charles River Rugby United Inc

Foster national or international amateur sports - rugby

Recreation & Sports
6
Granite Bay Rugby

The goal of the granite bay rugby program is to teach the basic skills and fundamentals of the game maintain a policy of no-cuts promote universal participation utilize positive reinforcements foster pride in individual accomplishments and…

Recreation & Sports
7
Iowa Rugby Collective Foundation
Recreation & Sports
8
Sbro New Jersey

The purpose of Rugby New Jersey is to promote the growth and development of the game of Rugby by providing support to NJ rugby clubs and developing participation in the sport by boys and girls across the state of NJ. It will further…

Recreation & Sports
9
Frederick Rugby
Recreation & Sports
10
Oregon Youth Rugby an Oregon Nonprofit Corporation

To promote and encourage teamwork, physical fitness and public participation in rugby

Recreation & Sports
11
Iowa Youth Rugby Assoc

The mission of the iowa youth rugby association is to grow the game of rugby and instill the core values of sport through providing a safe, organized, and positive experience for youth in iowa. and to proivde a pathway for iowans to excel…

Recreation & Sports
12
Northern California Rugby Football

Primary Exempt Purpose - Provide competent referees for rugby (juniors through clubs) mainly in Northern California and sometimes worldwide.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States of America Rugby Football Union Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY: $86,000 · Recreation & SportsUSA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBYCHUCKANUT BAY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsCHUCKANUT BAY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONGirls Rugby Inc: $32,500 · Recreation & SportsGirls Rugby IncNATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY ORGANIZATION INCWASHINGTON YOUTH RUGBY: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsWASHINGTON YOUTH RUGBYRUGBY LA: $6,667 · Recreation & SportsUNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTD: $30,000 · OtherUNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTDBennett Gallery Inc: $29,441 · OtherBennett Gallery IncIndividual grant recipient: $27,010 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCrusaders Limited Partnership: $15,855 · OtherCrusaders Limited PartnershipMIT Rugby Football Club: $10,739 · OtherMIT Rugby Football ClubWestern Washington University: $8,688 · OtherWestern Washington UniversityMLR Atlanta LLC: $8,500 · OtherMLR Atlanta LLCStellenbosch Academy of Sport: $8,000 · OtherELLENSBURG YOUTH RUGBY FOUNDATION: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · Education
Recreation & Sports$185,167Other$150,733Education$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUSA YOUTH AND HIGH SCHOOL RUGBY: $86,000 over 2y, 9.2% of budgetCHUCKANUT BAY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetGirls Rugby Inc: $32,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetUNITED STATES OF AMERICA RUGBY FOOTBALL UNION LTD: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGIATE RUGBY ORGANIZATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUGBY LA: $6,667 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United States Rugby Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United States Rugby Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $162k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United States Rugby’s filings →

    More from the funding graph