Skip to content

· Public charity

United South and Eastern Tribesinc

Advancement of u.s.

$8.1M
Granted FY2020
32
Grants FY2020
13
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Civil Rights$6.2MArts & Culture$4.9MHealth$2.5MEducation$66k
02FY2020 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $252k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+10 grants · $5.8M
$145,818
Median grant
13
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHOCTAW HEALTH CENTER$1,256,112
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS$1,018,329
SAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE$744,794
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA$561,456
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS$515,798
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS$451,759
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS$441,818
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE OF TX$308,578
Individual grant recipient$289,072
PENOBSCOT INDIAN NATION$258,025
MOHEGAN TRIBE OF CONNECTICUT$229,606
Individual grant recipient$195,126
JENA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS$173,000
MICCOSOUKEE TRIBE OF FLORIDA$156,330
CHITIMACHA TRIBE OF LA$148,564
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
CT
RI
VA
NC
SC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 20 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
12

Total granted

$13M
$1.1M

Still filing today

0%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHOCTAW HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $2.5M
  • SN
    SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1.7M
  • SR
    SAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1.3M

Funded once

  • BO
    B&GC of MS Band of Choctaw Indians
    one grant, 2020 · $452k
  • CI
    CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $92k · revenue -2% · 85% of their budget
  • CI
    CATAWBA INDIAN NATION
    one grant, 2020 · $79k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHOCTAW HEALTH CENTER: $2,530,224 · OtherCHOCTAW HEALTH CENTERSENECA NATION OF INDIANS: $1,696,201 · OtherSENECA NATION OF INDIANSSAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBE: $1,299,726 · OtherSAINT REGIS MOHAWK TRIBEPOARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS: $920,089 · OtherPOARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANSSEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA: $911,034 · OtherSEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDAALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE OF TX: $671,328 · OtherEBCI DIVISION OF COMMERCE: $617,885 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $506,289 · OtherB&GC of MS Band of Choctaw Indians: $451,759 · Other+20 more: $3,885,696 · Other+20 moreCHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE INC: $91,804 · Arts & CultureMonacan Nation Cultural Foundation Inc: $76,211 · Arts & CultureRAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE FOUNDATION: $39,609 · Human Services
Other$13,490,231Arts & Culture$168,015Human Services$39,609

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE INC: $91,804 over 1y, 85% of budgetMonacan Nation Cultural Foundation Inc: $76,211 over 1y, 30% of budgetRAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE FOUNDATION: $39,609 over 1y, 50% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICKAHOMINY INDIAN TRIBE INC ↗
  • Who funds Monacan Nation Cultural Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAPPAHANNOCK TRIBE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Nations Development InstituteCO25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Nations Development Institute · National Congress of American Indians Fund · Virginia Historical Society · Native American Agriculture Fund · National Indian Health Board · Weissberg Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United South and Eastern Tribesinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United South and Eastern Tribesinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United South and Eastern Tribesinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph