Skip to content
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union 7r Local at a glance

· Public charity

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union 7r Local

Labor union

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Benefit$150kEmployment$59kHuman Services$58kCivil Rights$45kCommunity Improvement$39kHealth$29kEnvironment$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $60,933, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,326 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,393 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $47k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADANS FOR THE COMMON GOOD$27,433
UFCW REGION 8 DISASTER RELIEF$10,000
ALLIANCE OF HEALTH CARE UNIONS$10,000
DENVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$8,000
JOBS WITH JUSTICE$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seiu Colorado State Council

The colorado state council works to integrate and guide priorities and campaigns for the service employees international union's two locals in the state of colorado.

—
2
Denver Newspaper Guild

To improve the working conditions and financial status of its members.

—
3
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
4
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 3000

Labor union

—
5
Indiana State Afl-Cio

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
6
Chicago Federation of Labor and Industrial Union Council

Labor council

—
7
United Food & Commercial Workers

To promote workers rights to fair wages adn benefits.

—
8
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
9
Ufcw District Union Local Two

To improve working conditions of its members and provide benefits of collective bargaining,

—
10
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
11
United Food & Commercial Workers

To enable working men and women to have representation in negotiating wages, benefits a good working conditons with their employer.

—
12
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations

The organization is a federation of labor unions. its mission is to improve the lives of working families - to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Area Labor Federation; the most unlike its peers is Denver Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO FAMILIES FIRST: $50,000 · OtherCOLORADO FAMILIES FIRSTUNITED NURSES ASSNS OF CAUNION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS NUHHCE AFSCME AFL-CIO: $28,540 · OtherUNITED NURSES ASSNS OF CAUNION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONA…COLORADO AFL-CIO: $27,500 · OtherCOLORADO AFL-CIOSTOP THE BAN PROTECT JOBS: $25,000 · OtherSTOP THE BAN PROTECT JOBSInternational Union UAW LOCAL 186: $20,000 · OtherInternational Union UAW LOCAL 186WYOMING WORKERS ORGANIZING FUND: $15,000 · OtherWYOMING WORKERS ORGANIZING FUNDUFCW REGION 8 STATES COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherInternational Union UAW Local 431: $10,000 · OtherDENVER AREA LABOR FEDERATION: $7,500 · Other+2 more: $11,500 · Other+2 moreColoradans for the Common Good: $150,290 · Community ImprovementColoradans for the Common GoodColorado Independent Liquor Stores United Inc: $10,000 · Community ImprovementColorado Independent Liquor Stores United IncDENVER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $8,000 · Community ImprovementCOLORADO JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC: $23,000 · EmploymentAlliance of Health Care Unions: $10,000 · EmploymentSOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$215,040Community Improvement$168,290Employment$33,000Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColoradans for the Common Good: $150,290 over 6y, 19% of budgetCOLORADO FAMILIES FIRST: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED NURSES ASSNS OF CAUNION OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS NUHHCE AFSCME AFL-CIO: $28,540 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO AFL-CIO: $27,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOLORADO JOBS WITH JUSTICE INC: $23,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetInternational Union UAW LOCAL 186: $20,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetDENVER AREA LABOR FEDERATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTH PACIFIC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUnited Food & Commercial Workers Local1564: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Food and Commercial Workers International Union 7r Local funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Food and Commercial Workers International Union 7r Local. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Food and Commercial Workers International Union 7r Local’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home