Skip to content

· Public charity

Unite Here 34 Local Fue

The union mission is to secure improved wages, working conditions & other economic advantages for its members through organizing, negotiating & the collective bargaining process through legal and economic means, and other lawful methods.

$580k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$327k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.5MEmployment$1.1MPublic Benefit$187kCivil Rights$22kMembership Benefit$20kReligion$7k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $549,443, the rows itemized in this filing. The $580,281 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,838 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $193k
  • $250k+1 grant · $327k
$192,993
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HAVEN RISING$326,950
UNITE HERE LOCAL 33$192,993
NEW HAVEN WORKS$20,000
UNITE HERE LOCAL 217$9,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITE HERE LOCAL UNION 26: $10k → 8%UNITE HERE EDUCATION AND SUPPORT FUND: $45k → 17%UNITE HERE LOCAL 33: $423k → 12%UNITE HERE INTERNATIONAL UNION: $22k → 17%NEW HAVEN RISING: $327k → 12%NEW HAVEN RISING: $276k → 12%NEW HAVEN RISING: $254k → 12%NEW HAVEN RISING: $240k → 12%NEW HAVEN RISING: $240k → 12%UNITE HERE LOCAL 33: $216k → 12%UNITE HERE LOCAL 33: $193k → 12%NEW HAVEN WORKS: $135k → 12%NEW HAVEN RISING: $88k → 12%LOCAL 34 PAC FUND: $79k → 12%LOCAL 34 PAC FUND: $54k → 12%NEW HAVEN WORKS: $27k → 12%LOCAL 34 PAC FUND: $22k → 12%NEW HAVEN WORKS: $20k → 12%LOCAL 34 PAC FUND: $19k → 12%LOCAL 34 PAC FUND: $14k → 12%NEW HAVEN WORKS: $13k → 12%NEW HAVEN WORKS: $13k → 12%NEW HAVEN WORKS: $13k → 12%UNITE HERE LOCAL 217: $10k → 12%FIRST & SUMMERFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 4 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against -97% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

$2.7M
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
-97%

Still filing today

75%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HAVEN RISING INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +44% · 99% of their budget
  • UH
    UNITE HERE LOCAL 33 GRADUATE EMPLOYEES AT YALE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $832k · revenue +259% · 95% of their budget
  • NH
    NEW HAVEN WORKS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $222k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • UH
    UNITE HERE EDUCATION AND SUPPORT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue -97%
  • UH
    UNITE HERE INTERNATIONAL UNION
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • UH
    UNITE HERE LOCAL UNION 26
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW HAVEN RISING INC: $1,425,571 · Community ImprovementNEW HAVEN RISING INC+1 more: $45,000 · Community ImprovementUNITE HERE LOCAL 33 GRADUATE EMPLOYEES AT YALE: $832,468 · OtherUNITE HERE LOCAL 33 GRADUATE EMPLOYEES AT Y…LOCAL 34 PAC FUND: $186,992 · OtherLOCAL 34 PAC FUND+4 more: $48,167 · OtherNEW HAVEN WORKS INC: $222,118 · EducationNEW HAVEN…
Community Improvement$1,470,571Other$1,067,627Education$222,118

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HAVEN RISING INC: $1,425,571 over 6y, 99% of budgetUNITE HERE LOCAL 33 GRADUATE EMPLOYEES AT YALE: $832,468 over 3y, 95% of budgetNEW HAVEN WORKS INC: $222,118 over 6y, 14% of budgetUNITE HERE EDUCATION AND SUPPORT FUND: $45,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNITE HERE 217 LOCAL: $9,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW HAVEN RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITE HERE LOCAL 33 GRADUATE EMPLOYEES AT YALE ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAVEN WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITE HERE EDUCATION AND SUPPORT FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITE HERE 217 LOCAL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Unite Here 34 Local Fue funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Unite Here 34 Local Fue. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 58%
  • New Haven Works Inc: 58% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Unite Here 34 Local Fue’s filings →

More from the funding graph