Skip to content
Union Hospital Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Union Hospital Foundation Inc

Support advances in medical care and initiatives which improve health for the residents of the wabash valley by making grants to union hospital, inc., union hospital health services, inc.

$808k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$583k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.7MEducation$1.5MPhilanthropy$36k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $617,963, the rows itemized in this filing. The $807,910 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $189,947 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $250k+1 grant · $583k
$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION HOSPITAL$582,574
UNITED WAY OF THE WABASH VALLEY$18,000
VNA HOSPICE OF THE WABASH VALLEY$17,389
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%RUTH HOUSE: $50k → 13%NORTH CENTRAL PARKE COMM SCHOOLS: $7k → 14%LANDSBAUM CENTER FOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $177k → 19%LANDSBAUM CENTER FOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $71k → 19%UNITED WAY OF THE WABASH VALLEY: $18k → 19%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 19%UNITED WAY OF THE WABASH VALLEY: $18k → 19%INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 19%LANDSBAUM CENTER FOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $13k → 19%ST MARY OF THE WOODS COLLEGE: $15k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $883k → 19%VNA OF WABASH VALLEY: $815k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $583k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $501k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $478k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $390k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $362k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $320k → 19%VNA OF WABASH VALLEY: $262k → 19%UNION HOSPITAL: $247k → 19%VNA HOSPICE OF THE WABASH VALLEY: $158k → 19%VNA OF WABASH VALLEY: $156k → 19%RURAL HEALTH INNOVATION COLLABORATION: $57k → 19%RURAL HEALTH INNOVATION COLLABORATIVE: $50k → 19%VNA OF WABASH VALLEY: $23k → 19%RURAL HEALTH INNOVATION COLLABORATION: $22k → 19%VNA HOSPICE OF THE WABASH VALLEY: $17k → 19%LANDSBAUM CENTER FOR HEALTH ED: $11k → 19%VNA OF WABASH VALLEY: $7k → 19%ST MARY OF THE WOODS COLLEGE: $100k → 19%IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.0M → 19%REACH SERVICES: $10k → 19%VIGO COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $111k → 19%VIGO COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION: $31k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.1M · 8 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$6.1M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+4%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UNION HOSPITAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +59%
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF THE WABASH VALLEY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +14%
  • RH
    Rural Health Innovation Collaborative Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $129k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +4%
  • RH
    RUTH HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +191% · 57% of their budget
  • LC
    LANDSBAUM CENTER FOR HEALTH ED
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
5
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
11
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

—
12
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana State University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ruth House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNION HOSPITAL INC: $3,763,479 · HealthUNION HOSPITAL INCVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF THE WABASH VALLEY INC: $1,438,469 · HealthVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF THE WABASH VALLEY INC+2 more: $179,029 · HealthIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION …Indiana State University Foundation Inc: $200,000 · EducationIndiana State Univer…SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE: $115,000 · EducationSAINT MARY-OF-THE-WO…LANDSBAUM CENTER FOR HEALTH EDUCATION: $260,815 · OtherVigo County School Corporation: $141,108 · Other+3 more: $28,680 · OtherUnited Way of the Wabash Valley Inc: $36,000 · Philanthropy
Health$5,380,977Education$1,315,000Other$430,603Philanthropy$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNION HOSPITAL INC: $3,763,479 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF THE WABASH VALLEY INC: $1,438,469 over 7y, 9.5% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetIndiana State University Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRural Health Innovation Collaborative Inc: $129,029 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetSAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE: $115,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRUTH HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetUnited Way of the Wabash Valley Inc: $36,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetReach Services Inc: $10,416 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Wabash Valley Communi…
Wabash Valley Community Foundation IncIN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Union Hospital Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Union Hospital Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Union Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home