Skip to content

· Private foundation

Uncle Kory Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$586k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.3MEducation$932kReligion$25k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$888k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$50,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$50,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$50,000
CITY OF HOPE$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$50,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$50,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$50,000
REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$50,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$33,584
THE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$25,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$16,416
BRAIN TUMOR EPIDEMIOLOGY CONSORTIUM$5,000
CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $50k → 10%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $50k → 13%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%WOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%CORNELL UNIVERSITY - WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $50k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $16k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $50k → 12%FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $25k → 9%CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 7%AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION: $50k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50k → 19%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%DAVID GEFFIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT UCLA: $50k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY - WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $50k → 16%THE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $25k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%BRAIN TUMOR EPIDEMIOLOGY CONSORTIUM: $5k → 7%AMERICAN BRAIN TUMOR ASSOCIATION: $9k → 14%THE UCLA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 7%DAVID GEFFIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT UCLA: $50k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 7%DAVID GEFFIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT UCLA: $50k → 14%CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES: $5k → 7%SOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE: $50k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%BRAIN TUMOR EPIDEMIOLOGY CONSORTIUM: $5k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $34k → 11%CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES: $2k → 7%THE UCLA FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%REGENTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%THE UCLA FOUNDATION: $38k → 14%THE UCLA FOUNDATION: $38k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 14%BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 14%CITY OF HOPE: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%JOHN WAYNE CANCER INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%SAINT JOHNS HOSPITAL & HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $38k → 14%CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
CA
CO
MD
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Uncle Kory Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Uncle Kory Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$777k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$602k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+26%

Still filing today

40%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $238k · revenue +51%
  • American Brain Tumor Association
    2× · 2021–2022 · $59k · revenue +19%
  • CB
    CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $24k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • DG
    DAVID GEFFIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT UCLA
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • TR
    THE REGENTS OF UCSF
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
10
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
11
Charles R Drew University of Medicine and Science

Charles r. drew university of medicine and science is a private non-profit student-centered university that is committed to cultivating diverse health professional leaders who are dedicated to social justice and health equity for…

Education
12
City of Hope National Medical Center

To make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. please see schedule o for a continuation of our mission.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $450,500 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERDAVID GEFFIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT UCLA: $150,000 · OtherDAVID GEFFIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT UCLACITY OF HOPE: $150,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPECORNELL UNIVERSITY - WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $100,000 · OtherCORNELL UNIVERSITY - WEILL CORNELL MEDICINEREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $100,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $66,416 · OtherAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $59,000 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF UCSF: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $50,000 · OtherSOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 · OtherTEL AVIV UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · Other+5 more: $64,500 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION: $578,269 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONDUKE UNIVERSITY: $237,584 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIACornell University: $50,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $100,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $50,000 · HealthChildren's Hos…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI M…BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $50,000 · HealthBECKMAN RESEAR…SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE: $50,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S C…SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $38,500 · HealthSAINT JOHN'S H…THE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US) LTD: $25,000 · HealthTHE MARK FOUND…WOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Religion
Other$1,390,416Education$1,065,853Health$363,500Religion$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $578,269 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $237,584 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $59,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $38,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAWN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES: $24,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE CITY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARK FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH (US) LTD ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOODLAWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL BRAIN TUMOR REGISTRY OF THE UNITED STATES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Uncle Kory Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Uncle Kory Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Uncle Kory’s filings →

More from the funding graph