· Public charity
Ui Labs Inc
Mxd (manufacturing x digital) advances economic prosperity and national (continued on sch o)
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k11 grants · $281k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+14 grants · $7.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOFTWARE AG GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC | $1,870,204 |
| SIEMENS CORPORATION | $1,108,574 |
| UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON | $870,507 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $539,760 |
| GEORGIA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH CORPORATION | $421,667 |
| THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY | $399,996 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI | $343,778 |
| MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY | $335,419 |
| ANARK CORPORATION | $322,775 |
| WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY | $305,564 |
| CORSHA INC | $298,472 |
| ARIS TECHNOLOGY LLC | $289,366 |
| CONNECTICUT CENTER FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY INC | $274,947 |
| THE BOEING COMPANY | $257,403 |
| APPLIED DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL INC | $240,748 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 58% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Dayton2× · 2023–2024 · $991k · revenue +7%
Northwestern University3× · 2021–2024 · $558k · revenue +14%- DUDREXEL UNIVERSITY3× · 2021–2024 · $250k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- CGCDW GOVERNMENT LLCone grant, 2023 · $709k
- AAT&Tone grant, 2023 · $342k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKone grant, 2022 · $213k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
To provide distinctive and relevant education in an environment of scientific, technological, and professional knowledge creation and innovation.
Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)
Education and Research
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
To help our clients solve problems and address critical challenges to safely, effectively, and efficiently move goods and people throughout the world by applying the most advanced, leading-edge expertise, by a team of passionate and…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide educational services, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Research Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Heartland Science and Technology Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Advanced Robotics for Manufacturing Institute · Johns Hopkins University · Northwestern University · Worcester Polytechnic Institute · University of Southern California · Carnegie Mellon University · University of Notre Dame du Lac
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ui Labs Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Connecticut Center for Advanced Tec — 40% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.