Skip to content

Kentucky · Public charity

Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council

The UFCW REGION 4 CENTRAL STATES COUNCIL comprising the states of indiana, kentucky, ohio and michigan, was formed to encourage organizing; to promote unified action to maintain, protect and advance the interest and welfare of the locals and the membership; to secure and promote legislation beneficial to its members and all working…

$75k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$56k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$15,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$25,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 7
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$760k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23
Human ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving3$56k100%
FY20232$50k100%
FY20212$42k50%
FY20207$49kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Employment$97kFood & Nutrition$34kHuman Services$25kMembership Benefit$25kCivil Rights$16k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
OH
KY
MD
DC
HI
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 13 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Food and Commercial Wrks Local 227: $34,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSouth Pacific Charitable Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Food and Commercial Workers International Union: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Latinos of the UFCW Inc: $15,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetUnited Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 23d: $15,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUnited Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 27 Afl-Cio: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Food and Commercial Workers Union Local No 75: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 876: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 880: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Food and Commercial Workers Local 951: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Food & Commercial Workers: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Food and Commercial Workers Local Union No 700: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

United Food and Commercial Workers International UnionDC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Food and Commercial Workers International Union

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council with peer funders

About Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council

How much does Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council give?
Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council reported 3 itemized grants totaling $55,500, out of $74,500 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 7 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Employment (49%), Food & Nutrition (17%), Human Services (13%).
Who are Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: United Food and Commercial Wrks Local 227 ($34k), South Pacific Charitable Foundation ($25k), American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio ($25k).
Does Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Food and Commercial Workers International Union.
Where is Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council based?
Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council is based in KY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ufcw Region 4 Central States Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph