Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ud Mulvaney Family Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$356k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$95k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$1.0MHealth$377kReligion$320kHuman Services$167kInternational$153kFood & Nutrition$138kPublic Safety & Disaster$110kPhilanthropy$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $249k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
$25,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIS HIGH SCHOOL$95,000
SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE$30,000
OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN$25,500
TEAM RUBICON USA$25,500
ST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$25,500
VALERIE FUND$25,500
FULFILL FOODBANK MONMOUTH & OCEAN CNTYS$25,500
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FDN$25,500
AMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC$25,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$15,000
NEW YORK PROVINCE SOCIETY OF JESUS$10,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF STATEN ISLAND$6,000
RESOURCE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVT$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $231k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $27k → 12%FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH & OCEAN COUNTIES: $27k → 6%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $27k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $26k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $23k → 12%FULFILL- MONMOUTH & OCEAN COUNTIES: $23k → 6%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $23k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $22k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
IN
NJ
CA
NC
DC
HI
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 18 repeat orgs$167k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
7

Total granted

$2.4M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+325%

Still filing today

44%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    AMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +47%
  • TV
    THE VALERIE FUND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +76%
  • OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $167k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • HC
    HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Head Strong Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGIS HIGH SCHOOL — $815,000 · OtherREGIS HIGH SCHOOLSISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS — $270,000 · OtherSISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODSTHE VALERIE FUND — $180,000 · OtherTHE VALERIE FUNDFOODBANK OF MONMOUTH — $63,000 · Other+14 more — $350,500 · Other+14 moreOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $166,500 · Human ServicesOASIS - A …THE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL — $49,500 · Human ServicesTHE FOODBA…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican N…ST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $124,500 · EducationST THOMAS…ST FRANCIS COLLEGE — $55,500 · EducationST FRANCI…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $25,500 · EducationSTEPHEN S…AMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC — $184,500 · HealthHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC — $12,500 · HealthTEAM RUBICON INC — $142,500 · Public Safety & DisasterWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $75,000 · InternationalGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,678,500Human Services$231,000Education$205,500Health$197,000Public Safety & Disaster$142,500International$75,000Philanthropy$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC — $184,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND — $180,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $166,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $142,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE — $124,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST FRANCIS COLLEGE — $55,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL — $49,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN SKIN ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC
  • Who funds ST THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE FOODBANK OF MONMOUTH AND OCEAN COUNTIES INC D/B/A FULFILL
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ud Mulvaney Family Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ud Mulvaney Family Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Ud Mulvaney Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph