· Public charity
UB Foundation Activities Inc
The mission of the organization is to undertake and perform activities in support of the educational purposes of the state university of new york at buffalo and its various departments, divisions or other entities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $3,506,878 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $28,733,405 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,226,527 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $277k
- $250k+3 grants · $3.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University at Buffalo Foundation Inc | $1,646,139 |
| University Medical Resident Services | $1,040,000 |
| University Emergency Medical Services Inc | $537,500 |
| UB Alumni Association | $211,952 |
| University Dental Resident Services | $65,000 |
| SUNYAB Student Association | $6,287 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UAUniversity at Buffalo Foundation Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $19M · revenue +180%
- UEUNIVERSITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +94%
- FIFNUB Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue ×20 · 73% of their budget
Funded once
- UFUBF Faculty-Student Housing Corpone grant, 2022 · $1.4M · revenue +22%
- AMACADEMIC MEDICINE SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $300k · revenue +25%
- TSTHE SPECTRUM STUDENT PERIODICAL INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -32% · 60% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
University urology, inc. is organized exclusively for the purposes of supporting the educational mission of the jacobs school of medicine at the state university of new york at buffalo (school) by participating in the plan for the…
University at buffalo neurosurgery, inc. is an academic neurosurgical group committed to excellence in patient care, research, and education. our mission is to develop and implement sound strategies that focus on quality medical services,…
University at buffalo surgeons, inc., is a large team of surgeons dedicated to the improvement of the health of our patients, cutting edge research, and the professional development of our students and residents. we are committed to…
Gsa represents the graduate students at the state university of new york at buffalo, as their voice to the university administration, faculty and staff as well as the community in general.gsa serves the graduate students by sponsoring…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide orthopaedic services to the patients of wny as well as provide clinical instruction to the students and residents of suny buffalo jacobs school of medicine.
Ub family medicine, inc. is committed to encourage and assist the faculty of the department of family medicine at the jacobs school of medicine at the state university of new york at buffalo in the delivery of health care. the organization…
The corporation assists the state university of new york at buffalo department of psychiatry in the delivery of health care, recruitment and retention of teaching physicians, and support of research in the field of psychiatry.
The mission of the university at albany foundation is to encourage, receive, accept, hold, invest, and manage money and property of every description, and the disbursement thereof for the promotion, development and advancement of the…
To provide the highest quality care to the population of western new york in the specialty areas of general and high risk obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive endocrinology & infertility.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University At Buffalo Student Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chiari & Syringomyelia Research Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FNUB Inc ↗
- Who funds UBF Faculty-Student Housing Corp ↗
- Who funds UB ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds UB ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds University at Buffalo Foundation Incubator Inc ↗
- Who funds UB Foundation Services Inc ↗
- Who funds ACADEMIC MEDICINE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT ALUMNI ASSOCIATION STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY AT BUFFALO ↗
- Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUNY IMPACT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds THE SPECTRUM STUDENT PERIODICAL INC ↗
- Who funds SWASIA CHARITY FOUNDATION A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
- Who funds MedGlobal Inc ↗
- Who funds CHIARI & SYRINGOMYELIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO STUDENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds AUXILIARY SERVICES STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT OSWEGO INC ↗
- Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO DENTAL STUDENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING THE GAP AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds SUB-BOARD I INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO MEDICAL STUDENT POLITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization UB Foundation Activities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.