Skip to content
Tzedakah Vchesed Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Tzedakah Vchesed Inc

TO PROMOTE WELFARE, EDUCATION AND HEALTH OF NEEDY INDIVIDUALS REGARDLESS OF RACE, RELIGION OR NATIONALITY BY SOLICITING FUNDS AND DONATING GOODS, SERVICES AND FUNDS TO SUCH INDIVIDUALS AS WELL AS OTHER ORGANIZATIONS OR INSTITUTIONS ADVANCING SIMILAR OBJECTIVES, BOTH FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.

$412k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$412k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.1MHealth$293kInternational$111kPhilanthropy$81kFood & Nutrition$10kHuman Services$8kPublic Benefit$7kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$411,539
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$411,539
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BREAD FOR ISRAEL: $20k → 6%CONGREGATION BAIS DOVID: $14k → 13%VARIOUS: $412k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITALIAN JEWRY INC: $19k → 17%CHASDEI MESHILIM: $328k → 20%BREAD FOR ISRAEL: $20k → 6%BAIS HAMEDRISH NETZACH YISROEL: $145k → 14%AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $160k → 17%CHASDEI MESHILIM: $149k → 20%BREAD FOR ISRAEL: $18k → 6%BAIS HAMEDRISH NETZACH YISROEL: $136k → 14%AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $98k → 17%CHASDEI MESHILAM: $102k → 20%BREAD FOR ISRAEL: $18k → 6%OHOLEI ZVI SPINKA: $118k → 14%AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $25k → 17%BREAD FOR ISRAEL: $18k → 6%BAIS HAMEDRISH NETZACH YISROEL: $98k → 14%CONGREGATION OHR MENACHEM: $17k → 20%MIVTOCH OZ: $91k → 14%GEMACH MEI HADAS: $25k → 20%CONGREGATION ATERES YISROEL: $43k → 14%BAIS HAMEDRISH NETZACH YISROEL: $41k → 14%CONGREGATION RAV LEHOSHIA INC: $38k → 20%MIVTOCH OZ: $37k → 14%CONGREGATION OHR MELECH: $36k → 20%CHOCHMAS SHLOMO CHASIDI INSTITUTIONS: $30k → 14%CONGREGATION RAV LEHOSHIA INC: $21k → 20%MIVTOCH OZ: $27k → 14%CONGREGATION BETH HALEVY: $19k → 20%MESIVTA ZIEV HATORAH: $25k → 14%CONGREGATION ATERES SHALOM: $18k → 20%CHOCHMAS SHLOMO CHASIDI INSTITUTIONS: $22k → 14%NVEH SHALOM: $17k → 20%CONGREGATION BEIS RATSFERT: $20k → 14%CONGREGATION RAV LEHOSHIA INC: $17k → 20%MIVTOCH OZ: $19k → 14%CONGREGATION OSEH CHOYIL: $18k → 14%TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC: $17k → 14%YESHIVAS OHR REUVEN: $65k → 14%YESHIVAS OHR REUVEN: $63k → 14%YESHIVAS OHR REUVEN: $63k → 14%CONGREGATION BEER MAYIM: $53k → 14%CONGREGATION TALMUD TORAH DCHASDEI BOBOV: $25k → 14%CONGREGATION BEER MAYIM: $23k → 14%CONGREGATION BEER MAYIM: $21k → 14%CONGREGATION BEER MAYIM: $19k → 14%CONGREGATION BEER MAYIM: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 10 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
36

Total granted

$1.9M
$597k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+16%

Still filing today

30%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $412k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHASDEI MESHILAM
    3× · 2021–2023 · $579k
  • BH
    BAIS HAMEDRISH NETZACH YISROEL
    5× · 2019–2023 · $427k
  • MO
    MIVTOCH OZ
    6× · 2017–2022 · $194k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $118k
  • CA
    CONGREGATION ATERES YISROEL
    one grant, 2023 · $43k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $36k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
2
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
3
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
4
Chaverim Foundation Inc

To help the indigent and other charitable institutions.

Human Services
5
Noam Shabbos Inc

To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel

Religion
6
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
7
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
8
Refua Vesimcha Inc

Assist the poor, Infirm, Handicapped and the underprivileged

Arts & Culture
9
Mifal Tzedaka Vchesed Chasdei Aharo N Inc

Provide financial assistance to torah and talmudic scholars, as well as to other needy individuals and other organizations that work to promote these purposes.

Philanthropy
10
Emunah Vchesed Inc

To offer financial assistance to indigent individuals and families in the form of gifts or through direct payments for living expenses and to provide food and clothing to needy and impoverished people.

—
11
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomche Shabbos of Rockland County Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Italian Jewry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHASDEI MESHILAM: $579,100 · OtherCHASDEI MESHILAMBAIS HAMEDRISH NETZACH YISROEL: $427,381 · OtherBAIS HAMEDRISH NETZACH YISROELVARIOUS: $411,539 · OtherVARIOUSMIVTOCH OZ: $194,100 · OtherMIVTOCH OZYESHIVAS OHR REUVEN: $190,920 · OtherYESHIVAS OHR REUVENCONGREGATION B EER MAYIM: $139,850 · OtherCONGREGATION B EER MAYIMIndividual grant recipient: $118,100 · Other+33 more: $482,970 · Other+33 moreAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $293,000 · HealthAMUDIM COM…Congregation Rav Lehoshia Inc: $90,410 · ReligionAmerican Friends of Biala Institutions of Bnei Brak Israel: $24,400 · ReligionBread for Israel Inc: $94,050 · InternationalTOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC: $17,445 · InternationalCHOCHMAS SHLOMO CHASIDI INSTITUTION: $72,480 · PhilanthropyTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $10,360 · Food & NutritionVYAZREIM INC: $7,200 · Public Benefit
Other$2,543,960Health$293,000Religion$114,810International$111,495Philanthropy$72,480Food & Nutrition$10,360Public Benefit$7,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $293,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBread for Israel Inc: $94,050 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetCongregation Rav Lehoshia Inc: $90,410 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Friends of Biala Institutions of Bnei Brak Israel: $24,400 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC: $17,445 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $10,360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH CHAIM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKUPATH EZRAH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $8,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds Bread for Israel Inc ↗
  • Who funds Congregation Rav Lehoshia Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHOCHMAS SHLOMO CHASIDI INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Biala Institutions of Bnei Brak Israel ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ITALIAN JEWRY INC ↗
  • Who funds TOV VCHESED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DERECH CHAIM ↗
  • Who funds KUPATH EZRAH OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LAMALH INC ↗
  • Who funds VYAZREIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…The Neuhauser Family …The Lexicon Foundatio…Lchayim Foundation IncMkz Charity Foundatio…Partners in Giving IncHf FoundationMarbeh Shalom Foundat…Schneid Family Founda…Zichron Avroham Moshe…
The Ojc FundNY53.6× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Neuhauser Family Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Lchayim Foundation Inc · Mkz Charity Foundation Inc · Partners in Giving Inc · Hf Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Schneid Family Foundation · Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tzedakah Vchesed Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tzedakah Vchesed Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tzedakah Vchesed Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Tzedakah Vchesed Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tzedakah Vchesed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home