Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tzedakah VChesed Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$371k
Granted FY2023
34
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0169% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$179kEducation$24kHealth$10kArts & Culture$4kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$400Civil Rights$229Public Safety & Disaster$104Other$0
02FY2023 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 34 grants below total $65,340, the rows itemized in this filing. The $371,190 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $305,850 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k33 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$280
Median grant
—
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Talmudical Academy$24,500
Yeshiva Gedolah of Toms River$5,000
Jerusalem Open House$4,500
Yeshiva Gedola of Paterson$4,000
Midrash David Foundation$3,602
Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel Chaim$3,600
The Donors Fund$3,000
LCS$2,700
KBL$2,200
Tomchei Torah B'Eretz Yisroel$2,100
Bais Yaakov High School$2,000
BRR$2,000
Congregation Minchas Yehuda$1,650
Moadim$1,400
American Friends of Brisker Yeshiva$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $36) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%A Time: $36 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$172k · 24 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
67

Total granted

$172k
$68k

Still filing today

0%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23
EducationReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UT
    United Talmudical Academy
    4× · 2017–2023 · $100k
  • L
    LCS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $9k
  • BY
    Bais Yaakov High School
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +48%
  • CB
    CONG BNOS DEVORAH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
3
Cheder Toras Zev

Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
4
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
5
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
6
Kollel Ohr Hatorah Inc

To expand torah education

Religion
7
Torah Institute of Lakewood Inc

To provide a quality religious and secular education to elementary school students.

—
8
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
9
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
10
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
11
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
12
Kollel Ohr Shmuel Inc

To learn, spread, and study torah

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kollel Tiferes Shimon Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Talmudical Academy: $99,950 · OtherUnited Talmudical AcademyIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherLCS: $9,125 · OtherBais Yaakov High School: $8,000 · Other+99 more: $109,920 · Other+99 moreLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,535 · EducationOhr HaTorah: $3,250 · EducationYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $3,000 · EducationBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationKOLLEL TIFERES SHIMON INC: $500 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $50 · ReligionA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $36 · Human Services
Other$238,995Education$16,285Religion$550Human Services$36

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $7,535 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BRACHA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohr HaTorah ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Jsp Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Jewish Communal Fund · Kol Sason Foundation Inc · Tifferet Moshe Inc · Fund for Life Foundation Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tzedakah VChesed Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tzedakah VChesed Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Bnos Bracha Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tzedakah VChesed Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Tzedakah VChesed Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $784k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tzedakah VChesed’s filings →

More from the funding graph