Skip to content

· Public charity

Tygart Valley United Way Inc

To bring together donors, volunteers, local health and human service organizations, and corporate leaders to address the community?s most pressing needs, facilitate solutions to those needs, and solve community problems collaboratively.

$363k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MFood & Nutrition$505kCrime & Legal$386kPublic Safety & Disaster$213kHealth$185kEducation$127kHousing & Shelter$126kYouth Development$76k
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 25 grants below total $334,097, the rows itemized in this filing. The $363,192 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,095 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $269k
$13,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$821k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER$27,850
MANNINGTON FOOD PANTRY$21,670
HOPE INC$20,848
CASA OF MARION COUNTY$19,820
RANDOLPH SENIOR CENTER$18,900
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$17,729
FAMILY SERVICE$17,425
MEALS ON WHEELS$16,484
MARION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY$16,200
MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT$14,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$14,000
ON EAGLES WINGS$13,860
LITERACY COLUNTEERS - MARION$13,500
STEPPING STONE$12,750
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$12,029
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $21k → 17%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $21k → 17%NCWV COMMUNITY ACTION - R: $19k → 17%RANDOLPH SENIOR CENTER: $19k → 17%RANDOLPH SENIOR CENTER: $19k → 17%RANDOLPH SENIOR CENTER: $18k → 17%RANDOLPH SENIOR CENTER: $18k → 17%THE CONNECTING LINK: $48k → 15%THE CONNECTING LINK: $46k → 15%THE CONNECTING LINK: $38k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $17k → 17%THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $30k → 15%RANDOLPH SENIOR CENTER: $17k → 17%THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $30k → 15%THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $30k → 15%NCWV COMMUNITY ACTION - R: $14k → 17%THE CONNECTING LINK: $30k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES - RANDOLPH: $13k → 17%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $28k → 15%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $28k → 15%THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $28k → 15%THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $28k → 15%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $26k → 15%THE CONNECTING LINK: $25k → 15%THE CONNECTING LINK: $25k → 15%HOPE INC: $25k → 15%THE CONNECTING LINK: $23k → 15%HOPE INC: $22k → 15%HOPE INC: $22k → 15%HOPE INC: $21k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $19k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $18k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $18k → 15%HOPE INC: $18k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $18k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $17k → 15%FAMILY SERVICE: $17k → 15%HOPE INC: $16k → 15%STEPPING STONE: $15k → 15%HOPE INC: $15k → 15%HOPE INC: $15k → 15%STEPPING STONE: $15k → 15%STEPPING STONE: $15k → 15%DISABILITY ACTION CENTER: $14k → 15%STEPPING STONE: $13k → 15%STEPPING STONE: $13k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 30 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
1

Total granted

$2.7M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+27%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $242k · revenue +331%
  • MF
    Mannington Food Pantry and Clothes Closet
    9× · 2017–2025 · $214k · revenue +59% · 32% of their budget
  • CO
    CASA OF MARION COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $163k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELKINS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
2
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
3
Summers County Council on Aging Inc

Provide services to senior citizens of Summers County, West Virginia.

Human Services
4
Tug Valley Recovery Shelter Associationinc

Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.

—
5
Harrison County Casa Program Inc

To recruit, screen and train casa volunteers for appointment to civil child abuse cases with the goal of permanent placement

Crime & Legal
6
Monroe County Council on Aging Inc

To provide services to senior citizens of Monroe County, West Virinia

Human Services
7
Child Development Center of Central Wv Inc

Provide childd care services and preschool for children birth to age 12

Education
8
Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency Inc

Eastern West Virginia Community Action Agency serves the disadvantaged people by determining their needs; advocating for and providing programs that help remove them from the causes of poverty.

Housing & Shelter
9
Family Counseling Connection Inc

Nurturing the mental health and psychological well being of children, adults and families.

—
10
Tyler County Family Resource Network Inc

To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote

Human Services
11
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
12
Central Child Care of Wv

Supervision of child care providers

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities West Virginia Inc; the most unlike its peers is On Eagles' Wings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CONNECTING LINK INC: $248,305 · Human ServicesTHE CONNECTING LINK INCTHE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC: $242,259 · Human ServicesTHE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INCTASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOPE INC: $158,512 · Human ServicesTASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOPE INCFAMILY SERVICE OF MARION & HARRISON COUNTIES INC: $155,235 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE OF MARION & HARRISON COUNTIES INCSTEPPING STONE INC: $102,086 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONE INCThe Committee on Aging for Randolph County Inc: $90,300 · Human ServicesThe Committee on Aging for Randolph County IncCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $83,679 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INCNorth Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc: $73,232 · Human ServicesNorth Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc+2 more: $52,635 · Human ServicesMannington Food Pantry and Clothes Closet: $214,309 · OtherMannington Food Pantry and Clo…THE SALVATION ARMY: $131,624 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MARION COUNTY INC: $104,284 · OtherLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MARION …SOBRANIA INC: $70,601 · OtherSOBRANIA INCAMERICAN RED CROSS: $58,574 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSHOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING: $44,100 · OtherHOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A…HARRISON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE TASKFORCE IN C: $34,800 · OtherMOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $25,228 · Other+3 more: $45,946 · Other+3 moreCASA OF MARION COUNTY INC: $162,569 · Crime & LegalCASA OF MARION …MARION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $142,325 · Crime & LegalMARION COUNTY C…RANDOLPH COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $46,000 · Crime & LegalRANDOLPH COUNTY…Taylor County Collaborative Family Resource Network Inc: $33,250 · Crime & LegalTaylor County C…MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $71,600 · HealthON EAGLES' WINGS INC: $69,574 · HealthMarion County Family Resource Network: $88,718 · Community ImprovementMEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $87,134 · Food & NutritionBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $76,060 · Youth DevelopmentHOMESTEAD FARM CENTER INC: $30,880 · Employment
Human Services$1,206,243Other$729,466Crime & Legal$384,144Health$141,174Community Improvement$88,718Food & Nutrition$87,134Youth Development$76,060Employment$30,880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CONNECTING LINK INC: $248,305 over 9y, 20% of budgetTHE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC: $242,259 over 9y, 10% of budgetMannington Food Pantry and Clothes Closet: $214,309 over 9y, 32% of budgetCASA OF MARION COUNTY INC: $162,569 over 9y, 20% of budgetTASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOPE INC: $158,512 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF MARION & HARRISON COUNTIES INC: $155,235 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetMARION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $142,325 over 9y, 15% of budgetSTEPPING STONE INC: $102,086 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetThe Committee on Aging for Randolph County Inc: $90,300 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMarion County Family Resource Network: $88,718 over 7y, 23% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC: $87,134 over 5y, 75% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $83,679 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $76,060 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc: $73,232 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC: $71,600 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSOBRANIA INC: $70,601 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetON EAGLES' WINGS INC: $69,574 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetRANDOLPH COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $46,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetHOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING: $44,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEART AND HAND HOUSE INC: $39,900 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHARRISON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE TASKFORCE IN C: $34,800 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTaylor County Collaborative Family Resource Network Inc: $33,250 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetHOMESTEAD FARM CENTER INC: $30,880 over 4y, 16% of budgetMOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $25,228 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetMARION COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $12,735 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELKINS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CONNECTING LINK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Mannington Food Pantry and Clothes Closet ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF MARION COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds TASK FORCE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF MARION & HARRISON COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Committee on Aging for Randolph County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Marion County Family Resource Network ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF RANDOLPH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds North Central WV Community Action Assoc Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILAN PUSKAR HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOBRANIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ON EAGLES' WINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds RANDOLPH COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE CARE CORPORATION D/B/A WEST VIRGINIA CARING ↗
  • Who funds HEART AND HAND HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HARRISON COUNTY CHILD ABUSE TASKFORCE IN C ↗
  • Who funds Taylor County Collaborative Family Resource Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOMESTEAD FARM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINEER AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARION COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF ELKINS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites IncWV20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Monongalia and Preston Counites Inc · George W Bowers Family Charitable Trust · Firstenergy Foundation · United Way of Harrison County Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Buckhannon West Virginia · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · The Antero Foundation · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tygart Valley United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tygart Valley United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tygart Valley United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph