Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Twing Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$280k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
18
Grants FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$4.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2025 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Twing Charitable Trust by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Summit County Rescue Group Inc$10,0001n/a
Food Bank of the Rockies$10,00010%
Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Inc$10,00010%
Parkinson Association of the Rockies$10,0001n/a
Denver Dumb Friends League$10,00010%
Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation$10,0001n/a
World Wildlife Fund Inc$10,00010%
American Friends of Natal Inc$10,0001n/a
Summit Lost Pet Rescue Inc$5,0001n/a
Smart Bellies$5,0001n/a
Colorado Energy Office$5,0001n/a
Matchdog Rescue$5,00012%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($170k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Twing Charitable Trust with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Twing Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Twing Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Twing Charitable Trust

How much does Twing Charitable Trust give?
Twing Charitable Trust reported 18 grants totaling $280,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Twing Charitable Trust fund?
By grant dollars over FY2025 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (39%), Health (25%), Animals (13%).
Who are Twing Charitable Trust's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2025 to FY2025: Summit County Rescue Group Inc ($10k), Food Bank of the Rockies ($10k), Boys and Girls Clubs of Metro Denver Inc ($10k).
Does Twing Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Twing Charitable Trust?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Colorado Gives Foundation, American Online Giving Foundation Inc, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Twing Charitable Trust based?
Twing Charitable Trust is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Twing’s filings →

More from the funding graph