Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tuw Margaret L Martin Char Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$557k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$2.3MArts & Culture$340kReligion$262kPhilanthropy$114kScience & Tech$80kYouth Development$76kCommunity Improvement$16kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $377k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$100,000
FLEMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$41,160
THE HINESVILLE ARTS COUNCIL$41,160
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$30,000
KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$25,000
MIDWAY MUSEUM INC$24,303
UNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE$24,303
MIDWAY CHURCH AND SOCIETY$24,303
LECONTE-WOODMANSTON FOUNDATION INC$18,684
GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL OF SAVANNAH$15,875
COASTAL EMPIRE COUNCIL BSA$15,875
MERCER UNIVERSITY$15,000
AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY$15,000
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 8%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 14%LIVE OAK PUB LIBRARY-LIBERTYCNTY: $20k → 14%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%COASTAL EMPIRE COUNCIL BSA: $16k → 16%AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $15k → 18%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $35k → 23%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $135k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $50k → 27%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 8%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $20k → 13%LIBERTY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16k → 14%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY: $15k → 18%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $30k → 23%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $130k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $40k → 27%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY: $35k → 8%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $15k → 13%LIBERTY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $16k → 14%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $25k → 23%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $110k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $30k → 27%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 8%LIBERTY CNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $15k → 14%SAVANNAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $18k → 23%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $100k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $115k → 27%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 8%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $15k → 23%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $90k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $100k → 27%KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%SAVANNAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%MERCER UNIVERSITY: $15k → 23%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $68k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $85k → 27%MIDWAY CHURCH AND SOCIETY: $24k → 14%MIDWAY MUSEUM INC: $24k → 14%LECONTE-WOODMANSTON FOUNDATION INC: $19k → 14%GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL OF SAVANNAH: $16k → 16%MIDWAY CHURCH AND SOCIETY: $16k → 14%MIDWAY CHURCH AND SOCIETY: $16k → 14%MIDWAY MUSEUM INC: $16k → 14%MIDWAY MUSEUM INC: $16k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
KY
VA
NC
SC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 46 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
9

Total granted

$3.1M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-2%

Still filing today

28%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $138k · revenue +19%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +159%
  • MM
    MIDWAY MUSEUM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $85k · revenue +0% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • LS
    LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • FA
    FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • PU
    PIEDMONT UNIVERSITY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
2
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
5
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
6
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
7
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
8
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
11
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
12
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spelman College and the most unlike its peers is Fort Valley State College National Alumni Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way AffiliatesLocal History MuseumsCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 71 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr14%10%20–35yr9%10%35–55yr13%75%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr14%7%20–35yr9%13%35–55yr13%74%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/24
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,277

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY — $632,500 · OtherGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA — $420,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIATHE HINESVILLE ARTS COUNCIL — $182,877 · OtherTHE HINESVILLE ARTS COUNCILKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY — $180,000 · OtherKENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITYFLEMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $176,977 · OtherFLEMINGTON PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH+38 more — $970,572 · Other+38 moreTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $137,500 · EducationTHE CORPORATIO…Emory University — $50,000 · EducationEmory Universi…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $35,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF TH…Savannah College of Art and DesignInc — $30,000 · EducationSavannah Colle…Spelman College — $25,000 · EducationSpelman Colleg…WESLEYAN COLLEGE — $25,000 · EducationWESLEYAN COLLE…University of Miami — $20,000 · EducationClark Atlanta University Inc — $20,000 · EducationEdward Waters University Inc — $20,000 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $20,000 · Education+4 more — $25,000 · Education+4 moreUNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE — $89,858 · PhilanthropyMIDWAY MUSEUM — $84,858 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,562,926Education$407,500Philanthropy$89,858Arts & Culture$84,858

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $137,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE — $89,858 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMIDWAY MUSEUM — $84,858 over 6y, 33% of budgetEmory University — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN COLLEGE — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORT VALLEY STATE COLLEGE NATIONAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEdward Waters University Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE COASTAL EMPIRE
  • Who funds MIDWAY MUSEUM
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Savannah College of Art and DesignInc
  • Who funds Spelman College
  • Who funds WESLEYAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds University of Miami
  • Who funds FORT VALLEY STATE COLLEGE NATIONAL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc
  • Who funds Edward Waters University Inc
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tuw Margaret L Martin Char Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Edward Waters University Inc15% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc2% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph