Skip to content

· Private foundation

Turvey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$103kInternational$79kHousing & Shelter$38kPublic Benefit$31kEducation$18kReligion$16kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$7,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$545k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PREBLE STREET$7,000
GIVE A BOOK$7,000
FEEDING AMERICA$7,000
REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA$7,000
CASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE$5,000
ACTON INSTITUTE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$485
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 85% of grant dollars ($286k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 15% that went abroad ($52k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREBLE STREET: $11k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $7k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $5k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $5k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $5k → 7%PREBLE STREET: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
MI
MA
OR
CA
VA
MD
OK

Beyond the US: 15% of all-years giving ($52k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$52k · 4 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Turvey Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Turvey Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$293k · 10 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +91% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$293k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+91%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    7× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +84%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $41k · revenue +98%
  • PS
    PREBLE STREET
    6× · 2018–2025 · $38k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • CM
    CITY MISSION BOSTON
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
4
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
5
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
6
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
7
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
8
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
9
Americares Foundation Inc

Americares mission is to help people and communities around the world access (see schedule o).

International
10
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
11
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
12
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIVE A BOOK: $51,664 · OtherGIVE A BOOKCASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE: $30,600 · OtherCASCADE POLICY INSTITUTEMINDS MATTER OF PORTLAND INC: $17,500 · OtherMINDS MATTER OF PORTLAND INCROSLINDALE FOOD PANTRY: $15,000 · OtherROSLINDALE FOOD PANTRYROSLINDALE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $11,000 · OtherROSLINDALE CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHCITY MISSION BOSTON: $5,000 · Other+1 more: $735 · OtherFeeding America: $63,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $24,500 · Food & NutritionREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOM…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $41,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…PREBLE STREET: $38,000 · Human ServicesPREBLE STREE…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $32,675 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES …PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 · HealthActon Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$131,499Food & Nutrition$87,500International$41,000Human Services$38,000Philanthropy$32,675Health$5,000Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFeeding America: $63,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPREBLE STREET: $38,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $32,675 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE: $30,600 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $24,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF PORTLAND INC: $17,500 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PREBLE STREET ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINDS MATTER OF PORTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Turvey Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Turvey Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Turvey Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Turvey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Turvey Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph