Skip to content

· Private foundation

Turek Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$116kAnimals$25kHuman Services$13kReligion$10kPhilanthropy$9kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$613k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vision Forward$10,000
Froedtert Eye Institute$5,000
Make A Wish Foundation$3,850
Life Navigators$3,600
Zoological Society of Milwaukee$2,300
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin$2,000
Catholic Community Foundation$1,000
Susan Komen Southeast WI Foundation$1,000
Beyond Vision$1,000
Meta House$1,000
St Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish$1,000
Medical College of Wisconsin Neurosciences$500
WI Breast Cancer Showhouse$500
Misericordia$500
Broadscope Disability Services$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Misericordia Foundation: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 17 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
22

Total granted

$153k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+47%

Still filing today

53%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LIFE NAVIGATORS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +64%
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +53%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • MC
    Medical College Wis Eye Institute
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • JD
    Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • CH
    Childrens Hospital Wisconsin
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
2
Wisconsin Council of the Blind and Visua

The wisconsin council of the blind and visually impaired's mission is to promote the dignity and empowerment of people in wisconsin who are blind and visually impaired by providing services, advocating legislation, and educating the…

Health
3
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
4
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—
5
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services
6
Legal Action of Wisconsin Inc

Legal action exists to provide creative, effective, and high-quality legal representation in order to achieve justice for low-income people and others to whom it would otherwise be denied. we advocate for empowerment and systemic change to…

Crime & Legal
7
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
8
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
9
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
10
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
11
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
12
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Berlin Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Zoological Society of Milwaukee: $24,950 · OtherZoological Society of MilwaukeeFroedtert Eye Institute: $22,000 · OtherFroedtert Eye InstituteLIFE NAVIGATORS INC: $21,050 · OtherLIFE NAVIGATORS INCMake A Wish Foundation: $5,850 · OtherMedical College Wis Eye Institute: $5,000 · OtherSt Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish: $5,000 · OtherSt Elizabeth Ann Seton church: $4,000 · Other+26 more: $31,650 · Other+26 moreVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $38,000 · HealthVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPO…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $10,100 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSI…Kathy's House Inc: $5,000 · HealthKathy's House IncCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $4,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN I…+2 more: $1,250 · HealthARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropyMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureLIGHT THE HOAN INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLOTUS LEGAL CLINIC INC: $1,000 · Crime & LegalWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 · AnimalsMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $500 · Human Services
Other$119,500Health$58,350Philanthropy$6,000Arts & Culture$4,000Crime & Legal$1,000Animals$500Human Services$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $38,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE NAVIGATORS INC: $21,050 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $10,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMETA HOUSE INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOTUS LEGAL CLINIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND VISION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildrens Oncology Services Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT THE HOAN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW BERLIN FOOD PANTRY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT LAKES HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VISION FORWARD ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LIFE NAVIGATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds META HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds HUNGER TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds LOTUS LEGAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds Childrens Oncology Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT THE HOAN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BERLIN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Archdiocese of Milwaukee Catholic Community Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Francie Luke Silverman Foundation Under the F Silverman Charitable Tr · Otto Bremer Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Hickory Fund Inc Co Curi Capital LLC · Franks L Wyenberg Charitable Trust · Gardner Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Turek Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Turek Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Turek’s filings →

    More from the funding graph