How much does Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council give?

Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council reported 25 itemized grants totaling $282,973, out of $760,110 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 16 and 33 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (60%), Public Safety & Disaster (40%).

Who are Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Post-Garza County EMS ($104k), King County EMS Inc ($99k), Scurry County EMS ($76k).

Does Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 57% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Where is Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council based?

Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council is based in TX.

Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council

Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council

Provide for trauma care in tsa-b.

$760k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$18k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$764k

02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 25 grants below total $282,973, the rows itemized in this filing. The $760,110 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $477,137 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k8 grants · $53k
$10k–50k17 grants · $229k

$12,212

Median grant

States reached

$1.2M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Individual grant recipient	$18,101
MEDICAL ARTS HOSPITAL	$17,884
POST-GARZA COUNTY EMS	$17,549
Individual grant recipient	$14,372
BROWNFIELD REGIONAL MC EMS	$13,375
Individual grant recipient	$13,255
KING COUNTY EMS	$13,215
Individual grant recipient	$13,215
Individual grant recipient	$13,155
Individual grant recipient	$13,128
PADUCAH AMBULANCE SERVICE	$13,123
Individual grant recipient	$13,095
Individual grant recipient	$12,212
Individual grant recipient	$11,293
Individual grant recipient	$11,251

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.8M · 37 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.8M

$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%

+56%

Still filing today

11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PC
POST-GARZA COUNTY EMS
8× · 2017–2024 · $104k · revenue +30%
DC
DICKENS COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE INC
6× · 2017–2022 · $73k · revenue +19%
FA
FRONTIER AMBULANCE CORPORATION
4× · 2017–2021 · $44k · revenue +68% · 36% of their budget

Funded once

IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2023 · $13k
MC
MED-TRANS CORP DBA AEROCARE
one grant, 2021 · $9k
IE
IDALOU EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
one grant, 2021 · $9k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

5/6

Grantees still filing

4/6

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$1,590,847Health$324,090

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Tsa-B Regional Advisory Council’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home