Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Trustees of Deerfield Academy

Deerfield academy is an independent secondary school committed to high standards of scholarship, citizenship, and personal responsibility.

$16M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Public Benefit$1.9MPublic Safety & Disaster$211kPhilanthropy$165kEducation$125kHealth$100kYouth Development$53kRecreation & Sports$44kHuman Services$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $308,637 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,940,403 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,631,766 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $59k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$13,637
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOWN OF DEERFIELD$250,000
DEERFIELD AREA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$25,000
UNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY$13,637
HISTORIC DEERFIELD$10,000
BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TOWN OF DEERFIELD: $250k → 14%UNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $14k → 14%DEERFIELD AREA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT: $25k → 14%BIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY: $10k → 14%HISTORIC DEERFIELD: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.2M · 5 repeat orgs$529k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$2.2M
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-25%
+21%

Still filing today

40%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $260k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TOWN OF DEERFIELD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M
  • DA
    DEERFIELD AREA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $211k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $131k · revenue -25%

Funded once

  • TF
    TILTON FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue -42% · 30% of their budget
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $34k
  • NY
    NORTHAMPTON YOUTH AND COMMUNITY ROWING INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tiverton Library Foundation Inc

To secure contributions to help support the operational and capital needs of the tiverton public library.

Education
2
Franklin Land Trust Inc

The franklin land trust works to conserve farms, forests, wildlands, and other natural resources significant to the quality of the environment, economy, and rural character of western massachusetts.

Environment
3
Fitchburg Historical Society

Museum and research library for history of fitchburg, massachusetts

4
Historic Hudson Valley

The organization's mission is to celebrate the history, architecture, landscape and material culture of the hudson valley, advancing its importance and thereby assuring its preservation.

Arts & Culture
5
Trustees of the Berkshire Museum

Bringing people together for experiences that spark creativity and innovative thinking by making inspiring educational connections among art, history, and natural science.

Arts & Culture
6
Walpole Historical Society

The preservation and interpretation of the history of the Town of Walpole

7
James Blackstone Memorial Library Assoc

Public library serving the community of branford, ct.

Education
8
Boston Public Library Fund Inc

The boston public library fund provides financial support to the boston public library (bpl), ensuring that it remains viable, engaging, accessible, and free to all. the library fund fulfills this mission by working in partnership with…

Education
9
Fitchburg Art Museum

The mission of the fitchburg art museum is to inspire creativity and learning, and to contribute to the well-being of our diverse communities in fitchburg, north central massachusetts, and new england. to accomplish the mission, we…

Arts & Culture
10
Bare Hill Rowing Association Inc

Provide a competitive rowing program for high school students and provide recreational rowing training for members of the community.

Recreation & Sports
11
The Millicent Library

Public lending library

Education
12
The Friends of the Nantucket Historical Association Inc

The acquisition of objects of major historic and/or artistic importance to nantucket and its peoples and to donate such objects to the nantucket historical association for public display in its museums and historical properties.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Franklin County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northampton Youth and Community Rowing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
2/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOWN OF DEERFIELD — $1,682,726 · OtherTOWN OF DEERFIELDTOWN OF DEERFIELD MASSACHUSETTS — $250,000 · OtherTOWN OF DEERFIELD MASSACHUSETTSDEERFIELD AREA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT — $211,059 · OtherDEERFIELD AREA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTUNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY — $131,213 · Other+9 more — $211,241 · Other+9 moreTILTON FUND INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC DEERFIELD INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · HealthNORTHAMPTON YOUTH AND COMMUNITY ROWING INC — $30,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,486,239Arts & Culture$110,000Health$85,000Recreation & Sports$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY — $131,213 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetTILTON FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetBAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY INC — $72,500 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetNORTHAMPTON YOUTH AND COMMUNITY ROWING INC — $30,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC DEERFIELD INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY
  • Who funds TILTON FUND INC
  • Who funds BAYSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON YOUTH AND COMMUNITY ROWING INC
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds HISTORIC DEERFIELD INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trustees of Deerfield Academy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc9% of income from government
  • Historic Deerfield Inc1% of income from government
  • Baystate Health Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Trustees of Deerfield Academy?

Find your warmest path to Trustees of Deerfield Academy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph