Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Tri-County Emergency Medical Control Authority

To support stakeholders and facilitate collaboration by providing leadership and medical direction of the ems system as prescribed under michigan law, p.a.

$148k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Health$226kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kCrime & Legal$8k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $143,865 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $148,065 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$18,557
Median grant
1
States reached
$598k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARROW CLINTON HOSPITAL$22,888
TRINITY HEALTH LIVINGSTON HOSPITAL$20,967
PROMEDICA VIRGINA HICKMAN HOSPITAL$19,074
EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER$18,557
MY MICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$17,798
SPARROW HOSPITAL$17,735
HENRY FORD JACKSON HOSPITAL$14,198
HILLSDALE HOSPITAL$12,648
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOWLERVILLE AREA FIRE: $8k → 5%EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER: $19k → 9%SPARROW CLINTON HOSPITAL: $23k → 9%PROMEDICA VIRGINA HICKMAN HOSPITAL: $19k → 12%HENRY FORD JACKSON HOSPITAL: $14k → 13%HILLSDALE HOSPITAL: $13k → 14%DELHI FIRE: $6k → 16%PROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $5k → 18%FOWLERVILLE AREA FIRE: $8k → 5%EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 9%SPARROW CLINTON HOSPITAL: $8k → 9%CARELINE HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%HILLSDALE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $6k → 14%SPARROW HOSPITAL: $18k → 16%FOWLERVILLE AREA FIRE: $8k → 5%EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER: $8k → 9%HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH: $7k → 13%BRIGHTON FIRE: $8k → 5%BRIGHTON FIRE: $8k → 5%TRINITY HEALTH LIVINGSTON HOSPITAL: $21k → 5%LIVINGSTON COUNTY: $8k → 5%LIVINGSTON COUNTY: $8k → 5%LIVINGSTON COUNTY: $8k → 5%LIVINGSTON COUNTY: $8k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Tri-County Emergency Medical Control Authority’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 91% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Tri-County Emergency Medical Control Authoritylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$131k · 5 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$131k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+44%

Still filing today

100%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2021–2023 · $34k · revenue +44%
  • SC
    SPARROW CLINTON HOSPITAL
    2× · 2021–2023 · $31k · revenue +41%
  • MH
    MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $26k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIVINGSTON COUNTY TREASURER
    one grant, 2021 · $32k
  • FA
    FOWLERVILLE AREA FIRE
    one grant, 2021 · $24k
  • BA
    BRIGHTON AREA FIRE AUTHORITY
    one grant, 2021 · $16k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

2
Trinity Health Grand Haven Hospital

We, trinity health grand haven hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.trinity health grand haven hospital is a member of trinity…

Health
3
Mercy Memorial Hospital Corporation

We provide high quality, comprehensive services to the people and community we serve.

Health
4
Mccullough-Hyde Memorial Hospital Incorporated

Acute care hospital facility delivering quality services to our patients and the communities we serve.

Health
5
Advantage Healthsaint Mary's Medical Group

We, advantage health/saint mary's medical group and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.advantage health/saint mary's medical group…

Health
6
Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corporation

Henry ford health macomb hospital (hfmh) is an affiliate of henry ford health system dba henry ford health ("hf health") serving the northeastern metropolitan detroit michigan communities. as an integrated component of one of the nation's…

Health
7
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc

The mission of mercy harvard hospital, inc. (mhh) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
8
Sparrow Specialty Hospital

Improving the health of the people in our communities by providing quality, compassionate long-term acute care to everyone, every time.

Health
9
Sparrow Eaton Hospital

To advance health to serve michigan and the world.

Health
10
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
11
Metropolitan Hospital

Metro health's mission is to improve the health and well-being of our communities. to that end the organization believes the foundation of good health is based on excellent quality primary care. the organization is anchored by a 208-bed,…

Health
12
Mymichigan Medical Center Saginaw

Creating healthy communities - together

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Health - Michigan and the most unlike its peers is Edward W Sparrow Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER — $34,322 · HealthEATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTERSPARROW CLINTON HOSPITAL — $30,888 · HealthSPARROW CLINTON HOSPITALMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,591 · HealthMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATIONWA FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $21,166 · HealthWA FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITALTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $20,967 · HealthTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGANEMMA L BIXBY MEDICAL CENTER — $19,074 · HealthEMMA L BIXBY MEDICAL CENTERHILLSDALE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $18,965 · HealthHILLSDALE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTEREDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL — $17,735 · HealthEDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL+1 more — $5,232 · HealthLIVINGSTON COUNTY TREASURER — $31,580 · OtherLIVINGSTON COUNTY TREASURERFOWLERVILLE AREA FIRE — $23,995 · OtherFOWLERVILLE AREA FIREBRIGHTON AREA FIRE AUTHORITY — $16,000 · OtherBRIGHTON AREA FIRE AUTHORITYCARELINE HOSPICE FOUNDATION — $8,000 · OtherCARELINE HOSPICE FOUNDATIONDELHI CHARTER TOWNSHIP — $5,890 · OtherDELHI CHARTER TOWNSHIP
Health$193,940Other$85,465

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER — $34,322 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPARROW CLINTON HOSPITAL — $30,888 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,591 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWA FOOTE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $21,166 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY HEALTH - MICHIGAN — $20,967 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMMA L BIXBY MEDICAL CENTER — $19,074 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $18,965 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDWARD W SPARROW HOSPITAL — $17,735 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $5,232 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan Center for Rural HealthMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan Center for Rural Health · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tri-County Emergency Medical Control Authority funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph