Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tr Eriksen Trust Fund Co Shelly a Smith Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$337k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$891kFood & Nutrition$533kYouth Development$494kHealth$385kCrime & Legal$226kRecreation & Sports$162kHousing & Shelter$131kEnvironment$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $277k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UKIAH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$50,000
PLOWSHARES PEACE JUSTICE CENTER$40,000
CANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF MENDO COU$40,000
WILLITS COMMUNITY SERVICES FOOD BAN$35,000
WILLITS DAILY BREAD$30,000
WILLITS SENIORS INC$30,000
UKIAH SENIOR CENTER$25,000
WILLITS KIDS CLUB INC$25,000
COMMUNITY CARE MANAGEMENT CORP$22,000
SPACE$20,000
COURT-APPOINTED SP ADVOCATES$10,000
MENDOCINO COUNTY SOCCER ACADEMY$9,000
UKIAH WRESTLING CLUB$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $260k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PLOWSHARES PEACE JUSTICE CENTER: $40k → 18%WILLITS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $100k → 18%WILLITS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $35k → 18%UKIAH VALLEY CHRISTMAS EFFORT: $5k → 18%UKIAH VALLEY CHRISTMAS EFFORT: $5k → 18%UKIAH VALLEY CHRISTMAS EFFORT: $5k → 18%WILLITS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 18%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES: $1k → 18%WILLITS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $17k → 18%WILLITS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 18%WILLITS COMMUNITY SERVICES: $12k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 24 repeat orgs$272k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
12

Total granted

$2.9M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+204%

Still filing today

54%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UKIAH SENIOR CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $315k · revenue +47%
  • WK
    WILLITS KIDS CLUB INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $288k · revenue +53%
  • WC
    Willits Community Services Inc
    6× · 2018–2023 · $204k · revenue +138% · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • LS
    LAYTONVILLE SKATE PARK PROJECT CO HOWARD MEMORIAL PARK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • PV
    POTTER VALLEY YOUTH COMMUNITY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +57%
  • WC
    WILLITS COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manzanita Services Inc

Business closed waiting for dissolution from California

Health
2
West Contra Costa County Meals On Wheels

Enable frail seniors to maintain their independence at home by providing them with high quality, nutritious meals that are cost effective, prepared in West Contra Costa County, delivered by caring drivers and administered by local…

Food & Nutrition
3
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
4
Mendocino Private Industry Council

To Provide a benefit to the public by providing work related training and job placement services to low income adults and youth (ages 16-24 yrs).

Employment
5
Sharing & Caring

Sharing and Caring assists the poor and needy in the Tehachapi, California community through providing: 1) rent/shelter & utility payments; 2) food assistance; 3) holiday meals & holiday gifts for children & their families who would…

Food & Nutrition
6
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

—
7
Community Center of Mendocino

The Community Center of Mendocino's main function is to provide after school enrichment programs for grade school children. Secondary function is to provide recreation.

Recreation & Sports
8
Volunteer Center of San Gabriel Valley

Provide referrals for court mandated community service. offer meal delivery for home bound individuals.

Philanthropy
9
Mendocino Coast Hospitality Center

Provide basic shelter services to the community's poor, those without food and shelter.

—
10
Valley Community Center

To provide meals, health related services, social activities and other services to the local community with a focus on seniors.

Human Services
11
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
12
Community Homes and Services

To provide services for developmentally disabled individuals and their families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Coast Opportunities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Renewable Energy Development Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UKIAH SENIOR CENTER INC: $315,000 · OtherUKIAH SENIOR CENTER INCCANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF MENDOCINO: $290,000 · OtherCANCER RESOURCE CENTER OF MENDOCINOWillits Senior Inc: $240,000 · OtherWillits Senior IncPLOWSHARES: $195,000 · OtherPLOWSHARESUKIAH COMMUNITY CENTER: $185,000 · OtherUKIAH COMMUNITY CENTERSPACE: $162,647 · OtherSPACE+23 more: $445,100 · Other+23 moreWILLITS KIDS CLUB INC: $287,500 · Youth DevelopmentWILLITS KIDS CLU…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF UKIAH: $185,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS C…Willits Community Services Inc: $204,000 · Human ServicesWillits C…PLOWSHARES PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER: $40,000 · Human ServicesPLOWSHARE…UKIAH VALLEY CHRISTMAS EFFORT: $15,000 · Human ServicesUKIAH VAL…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesWILLITS DAILY BREAD CORPORATION: $193,000 · Food & NutritionCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $166,000 · Civil RightsUKIAH VALLEY CULTURAL & REC CENTER: $94,000 · Recreation & SportsMENDOCINO COUNTY SPORTS ACADEMY: $38,000 · Recreation & SportsPOTTER VALLEY YOUTH COMMUNITY CENTER: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsThe Ford Street Project: $120,000 · Health
Other$1,832,747Youth Development$472,500Human Services$260,000Food & Nutrition$193,000Civil Rights$166,000Recreation & Sports$147,000Health$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUKIAH SENIOR CENTER INC: $315,000 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetWILLITS KIDS CLUB INC: $287,500 over 8y, 19% of budgetWillits Senior Inc: $240,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetWillits Community Services Inc: $204,000 over 6y, 44% of budgetWILLITS DAILY BREAD CORPORATION: $193,000 over 8y, 43% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF UKIAH: $185,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates: $166,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetThe Ford Street Project: $120,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetUKIAH VALLEY CULTURAL & REC CENTER: $94,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetCommunity Care Management Corporation: $57,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPLOWSHARES PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMENDOCINO COUNTY SPORTS ACADEMY: $38,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPEP Housing: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF UKIAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetNORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UKIAH SENIOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLITS KIDS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Willits Senior Inc ↗
  • Who funds Willits Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds WILLITS DAILY BREAD CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF UKIAH ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates ↗
  • Who funds The Ford Street Project ↗
  • Who funds UKIAH VALLEY CULTURAL & REC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Community Care Management Corporation ↗
  • Who funds PLOWSHARES PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MENDOCINO COUNTY SPORTS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds POTTER VALLEY YOUTH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UKIAH VALLEY CHRISTMAS EFFORT ↗
  • Who funds RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PEP Housing ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF UKIAH INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Mendocino CountyCA36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Mendocino County · George and Ruth Bradford Foundation · Mendocino Food and Nutrition Inc · Ukiah Adventist Hospital · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tr Eriksen Trust Fund Co Shelly a Smith Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tr Eriksen Trust Fund Co Shelly a Smith Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tr Eriksen Trust Fund Co Shelly a Smith Trustee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph