Skip to content

Washington · Public charity

Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition

As a national leader in environmental health research and advocacy, toxic- free future uses the power of science, education, and activism, to drive strong laws and corporate responsibility that protect the health of all people and the planet. We believe everyone deserves the right to healthy environments. Toxic-free future wins…

$459k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Itemized grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
9%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$435k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$30,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$195,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 15
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
8
Total assets, FY2024
$5.3M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 9% of the organizations Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$435k0%
FY202311$447k9%
FY20229$266k0%
FY202113$357k8%
FY202011$338k0%
FY201915$386k13%
FY201813$348k31%
FY201711$337kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.7MHealth$72kPublic Benefit$60kReligion$33kHuman Services$15k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
MD
NC
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 19 grantees
All grantees of Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Clean Water Fund$1,186,82083%
Clean and Healthy New York$280,500715%
Ecology Center$237,00083%
Defend Our Health$215,50074%
Alaska Community Action on Toxics$195,50073%
Vermont Natural Resources Council Inc$181,50082%
Vermont Public Interest Research & Education Fund Inc$176,50083%
Oregon Environmental Council$87,00071%
North Carolina Conservation Network$81,50071%
Maryland Public Interest Research Foundation Inc$60,00068%
Breast Cancer Prevention Partners$50,00021%
Bma Tenpoint Inc$32,50041%
Sierra Club$30,26020%
American Sustainable Business Council$28,50035%
Learning Disabilities Association of America$22,00022%
West Harlem Environmental Action Inc$15,0002n/a
Latino Community Fund of Washington State$15,00020%
Conservation Colorado$10,00011%
Ct Coalition for Environmental Justice$7,5001n/a

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClean Water Fund: $1,186,820 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetClean and Healthy New York: $280,500 over 7y, 15% of budgetEcology Center: $237,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetDefend Our Health: $215,500 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetAlaska Community Action on Toxics: $195,500 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetVermont Natural Resources Council Inc: $181,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetVermont Public Interest Research & Education Fund Inc: $176,500 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetOregon Environmental Council: $87,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetNorth Carolina Conservation Network: $81,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMaryland Public Interest Research Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetBreast Cancer Prevention Partners: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBma Tenpoint Inc: $32,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSierra Club: $30,260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Sustainable Business Council: $28,500 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetLearning Disabilities Association of America: $22,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetLatino Community Fund of Washington State: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetConservation Colorado: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Environmental Defense Fund IncorporatedNY19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated · The John Merck Fund · Patagoniaorg · New Venture Fund · The Marisla Foundation · Energy Action Fund · Natural Resources Defense Council Inc · United States Energy Foundation · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition?

Find your warmest path to Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition

How much does Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition give?
Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition reported 9 itemized grants totaling $435,000, out of $458,700 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 15 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (94%), Health (2%), Public Benefit (2%).
Who are Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Clean Water Fund ($1.2M), Clean and Healthy New York ($281k), Ecology Center ($237k).
Does Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 9% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated, The John Merck Fund, Patagoniaorg.
Where is Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition based?
Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Toxic-Free Future F/K/A Washington Toxics Coalition’s filings →

More from the funding graph