· Private foundation
Tower Mental Health Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST RESPONDERS SUPPORT TEAM MIDWEST | $65,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SKSoutheast Kansas Mental Health Center2× · 2018–2020 · $47k · revenue +715%
- CKCENTRAL KANSAS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER3× · 2018–2020 · $41k · revenue +146%
- CBCompass Behavioral Health2× · 2017–2020 · $19k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- CBCOMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $70k · revenue ×64
- KLKANSAS LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERone grant, 2023 · $60k
- AOASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTERSone grant, 2017 · $53k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The center for mental health partners with people and communities to produce exceptional mental health and substance abuse services.
Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.
Mental health care to those in need
Our mission is to achieve excellence in the provision of behavioral health services that lead to optimal health and well being.
Ensure the availability of quality mental health services to consumers of high plains mental health center
The region iii mental health center is a registered non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation dedicated to the establishment, development and maintenance of high quality mental health and chemical dependency care in south central montana.
Reduce the stigma and promote awareness surrounding mental health within the communities we serve, promote wellness, and provide individualized care with an integrated approach.
Make mental health healthier through treatment, training, education, and information.
To make a meaningful difference through healthcare innovation and caring for the whole person.
To provide mental health services to the public
To provide mental health and drug addiction services.
Nc mo mental health center delivers high quality trauma-informed behavioral health services in a caring and compassionate atmosphere that promotes dignity, builds on natural supports, encourages consumer choice, embraces cultural…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas and the most unlike its peers is First Responders Support Team Midwest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST RESPONDERS SUPPORT TEAM MIDWEST INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Kansas Mental Health Center ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL KANSAS MENTAL HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTERS OF KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds HEADQUARTERS KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds Compass Behavioral Health ↗
- Who funds FOUR COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF EAST CENTRAL KANSAS ↗
- Who funds LABETTE CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AND GUIDANCE CENTER OF TOPEKA INC ↗
- Who funds PAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Prairie View Inc ↗
- Who funds GREENWOOD COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KANZA MENTAL HEALTH AND GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR COUNSELING & CONSULTATION ↗
- Who funds SPRING RIVER MENTAL HEALTH & WELLNESS INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Iroquois Center for Human Development Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BERT NASH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH LAYTON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Association of Community Mental Health Centers of Kansas Inc · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Kansas Health Foundation · Greater Salina Community Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tower Mental Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.