Skip to content

· Private foundation

Toomer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$119kEducation$72kPhilanthropy$67kHealth$30kYouth Development$30kFood & Nutrition$17kReligion$12kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$10,000
ENTRY POINT$10,000
COBURN PLACE$8,000
BUTLER UNIVERSITY$8,000
BROOKES PLACE$6,000
CASS HOUSING$5,100
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TEENWORKS$5,000
WATCH US FARM$5,000
SERVANTS AT WORK$4,000
DOWN SYNDROME OF IN$4,000
VILLAGE OF MERICI$4,000
BEST BUDDIES OF IN$4,000
POST PARTUM SUPPORT INT$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%A HOME WITHIN: $1k → 10%SHELTERING WINGS: $500 → 5%TURNING POINT SYSTEM OF CARE: $100 → 15%ST MARYS CHILD CENTER: $5k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $8k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $8k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $8k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $5k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $4k → 16%COBURN PLACE: $3k → 16%THE PATACHOU FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%A LONGER TABLE: $500 → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK: $4k → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK: $3k → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK: $3k → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK SAWS: $1k → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK SAWS: $1k → 16%SERVANTS AT WORK SAWS: $1k → 16%91 PLACE: $3k → 16%91 PLACE: $3k → 16%OUTREACH: $2k → 16%OUTREACH INDIANA: $2k → 16%OUTREACH: $2k → 16%OUTREACH: $1k → 16%OUTREACH INDIANA: $1k → 16%IMANI AID: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
NY
OR
IN
CA
VA
MD
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$433k · 27 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
21

Total granted

$433k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

52%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MIDWEST ACADEMY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $42k · revenue +24%
  • BP
    Brooke's Place for Grieving Young People
    6× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +31%
  • CP
    COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +52%
  • FF
    FAMILIES FIRST INDIANA INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • CR
    CLIMATE RIDE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
2
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
6
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
7
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
8
Metropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc

Trusted journalism, inspiring stories and lifelong learning.

Arts & Culture
9
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
10
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
11
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Alternatives Incorporated of Madison County

Alternatives incorporated strives to eradicate domestic and sexual violence through education, prevention, and intervention in central indiana. the organization exists to promote the right of all persons to live in a loving, caring, safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Outreach Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cass Housing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY: $60,000 · OtherUNITED WAYENTRY POINT: $57,000 · OtherENTRY POINTMIDWEST ACADEMY INC: $41,500 · OtherMIDWEST ACADEMY INCIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,700 · Other+34 more: $94,200 · Other+34 moreCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC: $36,000 · Human ServicesCOBURN PLACE SAF…Servants at Work Inc: $13,000 · Human ServicesServants at Work…OUTREACH INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH INC91 PLACE INC: $6,000 · Human Services91 PLACE INCST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesST MARY'S CHILD …+5 more: $4,100 · Human Services+5 moreBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People: $39,600 · HealthBrooke's Pl…WATCH US FARM INC: $10,000 · HealthWATCH US FA…Butler University: $27,830 · EducationIndiana University Foundation: $1,000 · EducationTEENWORKS INC: $16,000 · EmploymentAssistance League of Indianapolis Inc: $11,000 · Community ImprovementCASS HOUSING INC: $5,100 · Housing & ShelterVILLAGE OF MERICI INC: $4,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$306,400Human Services$72,100Health$49,600Education$28,830Employment$16,000Community Improvement$11,000Housing & Shelter$9,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDWEST ACADEMY INC: $41,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBrooke's Place for Grieving Young People: $39,600 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC: $36,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetButler University: $27,830 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTEENWORKS INC: $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA: $14,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetServants at Work Inc: $13,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAssistance League of Indianapolis Inc: $11,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetWATCH US FARM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE CHRIS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetOUTREACH INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget91 PLACE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED CHARITABLE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE OF MERICI INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLIMATE RIDE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA LONGER TABLE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIMANI AID INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMPACT 100 GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT - SYSTEMS OF CARE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDWEST ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Brooke's Place for Grieving Young People ↗
  • Who funds COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC ↗
  • Who funds Butler University ↗
  • Who funds TEENWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds Servants at Work Inc ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of Indianapolis Inc ↗
  • Who funds WATCH US FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds 91 PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds CASS HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CHARITABLE ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE OF MERICI INC ↗
  • Who funds CLIMATE RIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds A LONGER TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN31.2× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Samerian Foundation Inc · Healthcare Initiatives Inc · Pacers Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Toomer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Toomer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Toomer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Toomer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Toomer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph