Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tooling and Manufacturing Association Education Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MScience & Tech$96kEmployment$8kEnvironment$6k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
MHUB$1,000
ALRO STEEL PROVISO WEST HIGH SCHOOL$997
UW-STOUT UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$780
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LUMEN STUDENT NEWS: $18k → 15%OSWEGO HIGH SCHOOL: $19k → 6%MCHENRY COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL- EAST CAMPU: $31k → 6%ADDISON TRAIL HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 7%CRETE MONEE SCHOOL DISTRICT 201U: $45k → 7%SAINT CHARLES DISTRICT 303 - COMPASS ACADEMY: $100k → 8%MUNDELEIN HIGH SCHOOL: $16k → 8%THORNTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $71k → 14%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR METALWORKING SKILL: $8k → 6%MCHENRY COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL EAST CAMPUS: $30k → 6%WEST CHICAGO HIGH SCHOOL: $40k → 7%CRETE MONEE SCHOOL DISTRICT 201U: $21k → 7%THORNTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $71k → 14%MCHENRY COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL- EAST CAMPU: $28k → 6%LAKE PARK HIGH SCHOOL DISTR 108: $39k → 7%WEST AURORA HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 129: $38k → 8%MCHENRY COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 6%LAKE PARK HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 108: $16k → 7%PROVISO WEST HIGH SCHOOL: $120k → 14%HARVARD HIGH SCHOOL: $45k → 6%KANELAND HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 8%HARVARD HIGH SCHOOL: $24k → 6%YORK COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL: $28k → 7%WHEELING HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 14%WOODSTOCK HIGH SCHOOL: $45k → 6%HAMPSHIRE HIGH SCHOOL: $38k → 8%HARVARD HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 6%HAMPSHIRE HIGH SCHOOL: $19k → 8%HOMEWOOD-FLOSSMOOR HIGH SCHOOL: $32k → 14%WOODSTOCK NORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $21k → 6%PRAIRIE RIDGE HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 6%MAINE WEST HIGH SCHOOL: $33k → 14%CARY- GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: $36k → 6%CARY-GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: $23k → 6%ROLLING MEADOWS HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 14%CARY-GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 6%ROLLING MEADOWS HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 14%STREAMWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $14k → 14%STREAMWOOD HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 14%RICH TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DIST 227: $18k → 14%THE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION: $87k → 14%THE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION: $8k → 14%COMM HIGH SCHOOL DISTR 218: $37k → 14%JOHN HERSEY HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 14%THORNTON TOWNSHIP: $50k → 14%TAFT PTA: $14k → 14%MORAINE VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $25k → 14%EAST LEYDEN HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$635k · 14 repeat orgs$922k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
55

Total granted

$635k
$911k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-31%

Still filing today

14%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EmploymentCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THORNTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $142k
  • TT
    THE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $95k · revenue +32%
  • CG
    CARY- GROVE HIGH SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2022 · $76k

Funded once

  • PW
    PROVISO WEST HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $120k
  • SC
    SAINT CHARLES DISTRICT 303 - COMPASS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • MC
    MCHENRY COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL- EAST CAMPU
    one grant, 2019 · $58k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THORNTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $142,000 · OtherTHORNTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOLPROVISO WEST HIGH SCHOOL: $119,845 · OtherPROVISO WEST HIGH SCHOOLSAINT CHARLES DISTRICT 303 - COMPASS ACADEMY: $100,000 · OtherSAINT CHARLES DISTRICT 303 - COMPASS ACADEMYTHE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION: $94,604 · OtherTHE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATIONCARY- GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: $76,013 · OtherHARVARD HIGH SCHOOL: $75,230 · OtherCRETE MONEE SCHOOL DISTRICT 201U: $65,860 · OtherMCHENRY COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL- EAST CAMPU: $58,297 · OtherHAMPSHIRE HIGH SCHOOL: $57,273 · Other+63 more: $754,096 · Other+63 moreNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR METALWORKING SKILLS INC: $7,500 · EmploymentMHUB: $6,000 · Community ImprovementUW-STOUT FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $780 · Education
Other$1,543,218Employment$7,500Community Improvement$6,000Education$780

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION: $94,604 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR METALWORKING SKILLS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMHUB: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUW-STOUT FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $780 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUFACTURING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR METALWORKING SKILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds MHUB ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tooling and Manufacturing Association Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tooling and Manufacturing Association Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tooling and Manufacturing Association Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph