Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Tonamora Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$239k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Health$130kEducation$97kArts & Culture$89kEnvironment$55kAnimals$50kCivil Rights$15kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $163k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SVHC FOUNDATION$110,000
MCCALLUM THEATRE$52,500
CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST$20,000
THE LIVING DESERT ZOO & GARDENS$16,667
COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC$10,000
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE$10,000
BUCKS COUNTY PLAYHOUSE$5,000
ECHO LEAHY CENTER$5,000
HILDENE$5,000
GREATER BENNINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$2,500
GAMMA MU FOUNDATION$1,000
MARTHA CANFIELD LIBRARY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE: $10k → 8%AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE: $25k → 17%BUCKS COUNTY PLAYHOUSE: $5k → 6%MCCALLUM THEATRE: $53k → 11%SARATOGA AUTO MUSEUM: $5k → 7%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $20k → 17%GAMMA MU FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%THE VERMONT LAND TRUST: $10k → 9%CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST: $20k → 10%MARTHA CANFIELD LIBRARY: $1k → 11%COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC: $10k → 11%AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE: $10k → 17%NEW HOPE HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 6%THE LIVING DESERT ZOO & GARDENS: $17k → 11%GAMMA MU FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%THE VERMONT LAND TRUST: $5k → 9%CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST: $20k → 10%MARTHA CANFIELD LIBRARY: $500 → 11%COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC: $10k → 11%THE LIVING DESERT ZOO & GARDENS: $17k → 11%ECHO LEAHY CENTER: $5k → 10%HILDENE: $5k → 11%COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC: $10k → 11%THE LIVING DESERT ZOO & GARDENS: $17k → 11%ECHO LEAHY CENTER: $5k → 10%HILDENE: $5k → 11%MCCALLUM THEATRE: $15k → 11%ECHO LEAHY CENTER: $5k → 10%HILDENE: $5k → 11%MCCALLUM THEATRE: $10k → 11%COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD: $3k → 11%SVHC FOUNDATION: $110k → 11%SVHC FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%SVHC FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%GREATER BENNINGTON COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$421k · 11 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$421k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+28%

Still filing today

55%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LD
    LIVING DESERT THE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +57%
  • COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +14%
  • VERMONT LAND TRUST INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SA
    SARATOGA AUTO MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
2
The Land Trust for Tennessee Inc

To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.

Environment
3
Upper Valley Land Trust Inc

The upper valley land trust helps people conserve land. uvlt provides conservation leadership, tools and expertise to permanently protect working farms, forested ridges, wildlife habitat, water resources, trails and scenic landscapes. see…

Environment
4
The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science & Art

See schedule ovision: the cooper union for the advancement of science and art is dedicated to peter cooper's radical commitment to diversity and his founding vision that fair access to an inspiring free education and forums for courageous…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Inc

The cary institute of ecosystem studies generates rigorous scientific knowledge about ecological systems and their importance to human well-being.

Environment
7
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
8
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
9
American College of Gastroenterology

Our mission is to enhance the ability of our members to provide world class care to patients with digestive disorders and advance the profession through excellence and innovation based upon the pillars of patient care, education,…

Health
10
Cumberland University

The mission of cumberland university is to provide a personalized, high-quality, value-based educational experience that equips learners to lead, serve, and excel in an ever-evolving world.

11
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
12
The Nebraska Land Trust Inc

To foster the protection of agricultural, historical and natural resources on land in nebraska through education, partnering and permanent conservation.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York and the most unlike its peers is New Hope Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SVHC FOUNDATION — $130,000 · OtherSVHC FOUNDATIONMCCALLUM THEATRE — $77,500 · OtherMCCALLUM THEATRECOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC — $30,000 · OtherCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTICECHO LEAHY CENTER — $15,000 · OtherECHO LEAHY CENTERHILDENE — $15,000 · OtherHILDENE+4 more — $12,500 · OtherLIVING DESERT THE — $50,001 · EnvironmentLIVING DESERT THELAKE CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentLAKE CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST …VERMONT LAND TRUST INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT LAND TRUST INCAmerican International College — $45,000 · EducationAmerican Interna…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $20,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF …COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC — $2,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER BENNINGTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,500 · Food & NutritionGAMMA MU FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$280,000Environment$105,001Education$65,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Philanthropy$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIVING DESERT THE — $50,001 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican International College — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE CHAMPLAIN LAND TRUST INC — $40,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER BENNINGTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGAMMA MU FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW HOPE HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tonamora Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 45%
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc45% of income from government
  • American International College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tonamora Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tonamora Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph