Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom W Bennett Estate

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$87k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.2MHealth$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.1MYouth Development$872kEmployment$662kEducation$654kPublic Safety & Disaster$436kReligion$218kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $875k
$58,313
Median grant
2
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY$87,469
Individual grant recipient$87,469
YMCA OF ST LOUIS$58,313
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$58,313
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$58,313
EPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$58,313
GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES$58,313
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$58,313
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$58,313
BARNARD CANCER INSTITUTE$58,313
MARYGROVE SCHOOL$58,313
BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC$58,313
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$58,313
SALVATION ARMY$58,313
THE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND$36,894
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $795k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $58k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $56k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $52k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $52k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $47k → 14%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $58k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $56k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $52k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $52k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $47k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $47k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $46k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $40k → 11%BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP: $38k → 11%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $47k → 21%GATEWAY REGION YMCA: $47k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 31 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
1

Total granted

$8.6M
$56k

Still filing today

32%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $436k · revenue +237%
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $312k · revenue +98%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2021–2025 · $265k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • YO
    YMCA OF ST LOUIS - GATEWAY REGION YMCA
    one grant, 2022 · $56k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
2
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
3
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

—
4
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
5
United Way of Greater St Louis Inc

United Way of Greater St. Louis mobilizes the community with one goal in mind - helping people live their best possible lives.

Philanthropy
6
Teach St Louis

Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…

Education
7
St Louis Society for the Blind

The society enhances independence, empowers individuals and enriches the lives of people who are visually impaired or blind.

Health
8
Girl Scouts of Wisconsin Southeast Inc

Girl scouts of wisconsin southeast, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, is the preeminent membership-based organization dedicated to helping all girls develop the confidence, determination, and skills needed to thrive in today's world. girl scouting…

Youth Development
9
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
10
Methodist Healthcare-Memphis Hospitals

Methodist le bonheur healthcare, in partnership with its medical staffs, will collaborate with patients and their families to be the leader in providing high quality, cost-effective patient-and family-centered care. services will be…

Health
11
Ssm Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
12
St Louis Regional Chamber & Growth Association

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epworth Children & Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Lighthouse for the Blind. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $653,859 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY: $653,859 · OtherUNITED WAYGOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $435,905 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIESMARYGROVE SCHOOL: $435,905 · OtherMARYGROVE SCHOOLBARNARD CANCER INSTITUTE: $435,905 · OtherBARNARD CANCER INSTITUTEST LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $435,905 · OtherST LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITALEPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $435,905 · OtherEPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INCSALVATION ARMY: $413,063 · OtherSALVATION ARMYST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $374,808 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $312,280 · OtherBOYS CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC: $258,003 · Other+15 more: $2,225,580 · Other+15 moreBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $435,905 · Human ServicesBETHESDA H…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $265,253 · Human ServicesAmerican N…GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $94,125 · Human ServicesGATEWAY RE…GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND: $395,855 · Youth DevelopmentCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $217,952 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $210,215 · AnimalsST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $32,023 · Philanthropy
Other$7,070,977Human Services$795,283Youth Development$395,855Education$217,952Animals$210,215Philanthropy$32,023

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $435,905 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC: $435,905 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND: $395,855 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: $312,280 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $265,253 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $225,690 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF: $217,952 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetST LOUIS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM: $217,952 over 9y, 30% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC: $217,952 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI: $210,215 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $94,125 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $32,023 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHESDA HEALTH GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS INTERNSHIP PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater St Louis IncMO17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Co Tr Ua Viola J Reynolds · Leo R Buder Foundation Trust · Elberth R & Gladys F Grant Char · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Centene Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Graybar Foundation · East Missouri Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Edward Jones Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom W Bennett Estate funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom W Bennett Estate. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom W Bennett Estate’s filings →

    More from the funding graph