Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom J & Edna Mae Carson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$595k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$251k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.8MHealth$1.0MArts & Culture$259kHuman Services$208kFood & Nutrition$161kYouth Development$152kReligion$144kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $258k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $251k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Westville Public Schools$250,825
Northeastern University$75,000
Orchard Road Community Outreach$48,000
Jermiah 29 Foundation$41,000
Adair County Junior Livestock$40,950
Stilwell Youth League$22,000
Stilwell Public Schools$21,000
Adair County Resouce Center$20,000
Communities Foundation of Oklahoma$20,000
Tenkiler Public School$15,000
Cave Springs School$15,000
Westville Education Foundation$14,950
AR OK Reg Education & Promo Assn Inc$3,150
AR-OK State Fair$2,700
Watts Public Schools$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $35k → 18%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $30k → 18%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $25k → 18%Orchard Road Community Outreach: $48k → 21%ORCHARD ROAD COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $38k → 21%ORCHARD ROAD COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $30k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 22 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
30

Total granted

$3.3M
$775k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+16%

Still filing today

32%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $353k · revenue +63%
  • AC
    ADAIR COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +16% · 35% of their budget
  • JB
    JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $40k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • AC
    ADAIR COUNTY FAIR BOARD
    one grant, 2023 · $250k
  • AT
    A T Still University of Health Sciences
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +16%
  • ZP
    ZION PUBLIC SCHOOL #28
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Baptist University

As a christian liberal arts university, oklahoma baptist university transforms lives by equipping students to pursue academic excellence, integrate faith with all areas of knowledge, engage a diverse world, and live worthy of the high…

Education
2
Oklahoma Association of Realtors

The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

—
3
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
4
Oucu Financial Credit Union Fka Ohio University Credit Union

Provide financial services to its members.

—
5
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
6
Ohio Christian University

Ohio christian university (ocu) is committed to offering a complete education that develops students intellectually, professionally, and spiritually. (continued on schedule o)ocu offers degree programs designed to equip students to become…

Education
7
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
8
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
9
Oklahoma Dental Association

Fosters an awareness of the obligations and responsibilities of the dental profession to society, to help advance the art and science of dentistry, and to promote public health and health services in the state of oklahoma.

—
10
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

American college of occupational and environmental medicine (acoem) provides leadership to promote optimal health and safety of workers, workplaces and environments by: educating health professionals and the public; stimulating research;…

Arts & Culture
11
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
12
Ouachita Baptist University

Ouachita baptist university is a christ-centered learning community. embracing the liberal arts tradition, the university prepares individuals for ongoing intellectual and spiritual growth, lives of meaningful work, and reasoned engagement…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma State University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is A T Still University of Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $364,476 · OtherWESTVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $308,764 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWestville Public Schools: $250,825 · OtherWestville Public SchoolsADAIR COUNTY FAIR BOARD: $250,000 · OtherADAIR COUNTY FAIR BOARDIndividual grant recipient: $180,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEREMIAH 29 FOUNDATION: $144,000 · OtherJEREMIAH 29 FOUNDATIONSTILWELL PUBLIC SCHOOL: $135,409 · OtherMARYETTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $128,729 · OtherSTILWELL YOUTH: $124,878 · OtherAdair County Junior Livestock: $111,700 · OtherZION PUBLIC SCHOOL #28: $100,000 · Other+39 more: $515,181 · Other+39 moreADAIR COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,002,000 · HealthADAIR COUNTY HEALTH CENTE…Oklahoma State University Foundation: $352,700 · EducationOklahoma Stat…A T Still University of Health Sciences: $150,000 · EducationA T Still Uni…JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationJOHN BROWN UN…+1 more: $4,000 · EducationORCHARD ROAD COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $115,800 · Human ServicesCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesADAIR COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $44,500 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $20,000 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,613,962Health$1,002,000Education$546,700Human Services$205,800Food & Nutrition$44,500Philanthropy$20,000Youth Development$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADAIR COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,002,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $352,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORCHARD ROAD COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $115,800 over 3y, 64% of budgetCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $90,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetADAIR COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $44,500 over 3y, 35% of budgetJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZOE INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOKLAHOMA 4-H FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTILWELL KIWANIS CLUB: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetINDIAN NATIONS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADAIR COUNTY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds A T Still University of Health Sciences ↗
  • Who funds ORCHARD ROAD COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ADAIR COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA ↗
  • Who funds ZOE INSTITUTE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arvest FoundationAR15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom J & Edna Mae Carson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom J & Edna Mae Carson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tom J & Edna Mae Carson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tom J & Edna Mae Carson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom J & Edna Mae Carson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph