Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tom G Margittai Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$33kArts & Culture$13kCommunity Improvement$9kAnimals$3kPhilanthropy$1kCivil Rights$1kHealth$500Human Services$200
02FY2020 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$33,330
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION$33,330
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER: $100 → 14%LAMBDA LEGAL: $1k → 17%THE LENSIC: $3k → 12%UNM CANCER CENTER: $500 → 14%US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $100 → 14%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $200 → 9%SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 12%BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $200 → 9%SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 12%LIFE CENTER FOUNDATION: $200 → 12%SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 3 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$14k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+49%

Still filing today

100%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20
Arts & CultureAnimalsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +32%
  • SF
    SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +36%
  • BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $400 · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAS COMPANAS COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • LL
    LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +187%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Jewish Community Foundation of Nm

To build and perpetuate support for a vibrant, caring jewish community through partnerships with donors and organizations. the foundation receives, administers and disposes of funds for charitable purposes.

Philanthropy
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
8
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
9
Santa Fe Institute

The santa fe institute is a transdisciplinary research community that expands the boundaries of scientific understanding. its aim is to discover, comprehend, and communicate the common fundamental principles in complex physical,…

Science & Tech
10
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
11
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
12
San Jose Museum of Art Association

Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Fe Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC: $33,330 · OtherNEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INCLAS COMPANAS COMMUNITY FUND: $8,750 · OtherLAS COMPANAS COMMUNITY FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+4 more: $1,150 · OtherSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD: $10,250 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CHAMBER MU…+2 more: $200 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $400 · AnimalsLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$45,730Arts & Culture$10,450Animals$3,400Civil Rights$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW YORK CITY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC: $33,330 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD: $10,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CENTER FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tom G Margittai Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tom G Margittai Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tom G Margittai Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tom G Margittai Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tom G Margittai’s filings →

    More from the funding graph