Skip to content

· Private foundation

Todd Hans Rothpletz Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kHousing & Shelter$2kEnvironment$1kFood & Nutrition$1kEducation$500
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$54k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MYASTEHNIA GRAVIS FOUNDATION OF AME$1,000
BREAKTHROUGH TID$500
MANE STREAM$500
TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES$500
Individual grant recipient$500
OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 34% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%MYASTEHNIA GRAVIS FOUNDATION OF AME: $1k → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2k → 17%WHITEHOUSE RESCUE SQUAD: $500 → 4%TYPE 1 WILLPOWERORG: $500 → 4%NJ CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 5%NJ AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY FOR FARMERS: $500 → 7%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $2k → 8%MYASTEHNIA GRAVIS FOUNDATION OF AME: $1k → 11%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1k → 17%WHITEHOUSE RESCUE SQUAD: $500 → 4%NJ AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY FOR FARMERS: $500 → 7%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $1k → 8%DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $1k → 17%WHITEHOUSE RESCUE SQUAD: $500 → 4%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $1k → 8%MANE STREAM: $1k → 4%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $1k → 8%TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $1k → 4%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $500 → 8%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%BREAKTHROUGH TID: $500 → 8%MANE STREAM: $1k → 4%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $500 → 8%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $500 → 8%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $1k → 4%TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $1k → 4%MANE STREAM: $1k → 4%TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $1k → 4%MANE STREAM: $1k → 4%OLDWICK LIBRARY: $500 → 4%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $500 → 4%TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $500 → 4%MANE STREAM: $500 → 4%TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $500 → 4%MANE STREAM: $500 → 4%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $500 → 4%MANE STREAM: $500 → 4%POTTERSVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $500 → 4%POTTERSVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY: $500 → 4%POTTERSVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%MANE STREAM: $500 → 4%POTTERSVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $1k → 4%TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $500 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41k · 10 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$41k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

30%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +58%
  • MS
    Mane Stream Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7k · revenue +36%
  • MG
    Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -50%
  • T1
    TYPE 1 WILLPOWER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue 0%
  • OL
    OLDWICK LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RES: $6,500 · OtherTEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RESMane Stream Inc: $6,500 · OtherMane Stream IncDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $4,000 · OtherDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTEJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $4,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH: $2,500 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCHWHITEHOUSE RESCUE SQUAD: $1,500 · Other+3 more: $2,000 · Other+3 moreOLDWICK FIRE COMPANY INC: $6,500 · Public Safety & DisasterOLDWICK FIRE COM…Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Inc: $2,000 · HealthTYPE 1 WILLPOWER INC: $500 · HealthNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Environment
Other$33,500Public Safety & Disaster$6,500Health$2,500Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLDWICK FIRE COMPANY INC: $6,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMane Stream Inc: $6,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMyasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTYPE 1 WILLPOWER INC: $500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLDWICK FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds Mane Stream Inc ↗
  • Who funds Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY CONSERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TYPE 1 WILLPOWER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Verizon FoundationNJ12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Todd Hans Rothpletz Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Todd Hans Rothpletz Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mane Stream Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Todd Hans Rothpletz’s filings →

More from the funding graph