Skip to content

· Charitable trust

Tissue Bank Asbestos Research Charitable Trust

The organization's primary mission is to meet the goal of reducing the devastating impact of, and ultimately finding a cure for, the ravages of the disease associated with exposure to asbestos.

$130k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$325kEmployment$73kEducation$67kHuman Services$25kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$8k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $66,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $129,700 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $63,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRADESFUTURE$25,000
CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT$15,000
DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$10,000
BREATH OF LIFE FOUNDATION$10,000
GEORGE SNYDER JR MEMORIAL FUND$6,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HAWAII EMPLOYEES LIFELINE PROGRAM: $25k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
MD
DC
HI

Grants abroad, by region: $25k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$25k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$88k · 3 repeat orgs$420k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$88k
$379k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+3%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’23’24’25
EducationHealthEmploymentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $38k · revenue +39%
  • DR
    DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +60%
  • TM
    THE MESOTHELIOMA APPLIED RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k · revenue -64%

Funded once

  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIgraduated
    2× · 2017–2018 · $169k · revenue +58%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL (DR MICHAEL HARBUT)
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2024 · $61k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation for Applied Research in Gastrointestinal Oncology
Health
2
Fund for Myeloma Education and Research Inc
Health
3
De Gunzburg Myeloma Research Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Eleanor Roosevelt Institute for Cancer Research

Raise funds for biomedical research

—
5
Insall Scott Research Foundation in

Clinical research & education

—
6
Brain Cancer Research Institute

The organization conducts research and trials for delivery of personalizedmedicine through a regenerative process and the utilization of artificialintelligence. this research is conducted through the use of transdisciplinaryapproaches for…

Health
7
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
8
Meryl Suzanne Weiss Fund

Provides grants for medical research and education

—
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Military Health Research Foundation Inc

The military health research foundation(mhrf) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to the advancement of military medical research to benefit the health and safety of the men and women of the united states armed forces.

Science & Tech
11
Meyer Memorial Trust
Philanthropy
12
Simmons Mesothelioma Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is George Snyder Memorial Trust Fund; the most unlike its peers is Hawaii Employees Lifeline Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $168,749 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAITRADESFUTURES: $25,000 · EducationTRADESFUTURES+1 more: $6,000 · EducationCENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL (DR MICHAEL HARBUT): $100,008 · OtherCENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENT…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $61,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY…INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS: $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRU…PIRATES INC: $8,000 · OtherDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthDIABETES RES…THE MESOTHELIOMA APPLIED RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE MESOTHEL…GEORGE SNYDER MEMORIAL TRUST FUND: $6,200 · HealthGEORGE SNYDE…CENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT: $37,500 · EmploymentHAWAII EMPLOYEES LIFELINE PROGRAM: $25,000 · Human ServicesBREATH OF LIFE CHARITY FUND: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Education$199,749Other$179,008Health$56,200Employment$37,500Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $168,749 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT ASSESSMENT AND VETERANS EMPLOYMENT: $37,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII EMPLOYEES LIFELINE PROGRAM: $25,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTHE MESOTHELIOMA APPLIED RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBREATH OF LIFE CHARITY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetPIRATES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGEORGE SNYDER MEMORIAL TRUST FUND: $6,200 over 1y, 15% of budgetSHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tissue Bank Asbestos Research Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tissue Bank Asbestos Research Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tissue Bank Asbestos Research Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Tissue Bank Asbestos Research Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tissue Bank Asbestos Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph