Skip to content
Time's Up Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Time's Up Foundation

The TIME'S UP FOUNDATION insists upon safe, fair, and dignified work for all by changing culture, companies, and laws.

$1.7M
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2022.

Crime & Legal$7.4MEmployment$341kArts & Culture$228kEducation$107kRecreation & Sports$75kHealth$55kCommunity Improvement$50kHuman Services$25k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,700,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER$1,700,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Insight Center for Community Economic Development: $50k → 10%UNITED STATES WOMENS NATIONAL SOCCER TEAM PLAYERS ASSO: $75k → 10%THE UCLA FOUNDATION: $107k → 14%National Employment Law Project: $50k → 17%New York Foundation for the Arts: $228k → 20%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $1.7M → 14%Panorama Global: $100k → 9%The Regents of the University of California: $60k → 10%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $3.0M → 14%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $1.9M → 14%National Women's Law Center: $603k → 14%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $133k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women in Product

Our mission is to equip women and non-binary folks to thrive in product management careers at all levels. we want all people to have equitable opportunities to build rewarding careers and shape the products of the future.

Human Services
2
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
3
Women Employed

To improve the economic status of women and remove barriers to economic equity.

Employment
4
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
5
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
6
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
7
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women and girls in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Washington Women's Foundation

Washington women's foundation is a strong and inclusive collective of informed women who together influence community transformation through individual and collective discovery, high-impact grant making and by listening to and respecting…

Philanthropy
10
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
11
Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Include. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $7,399,855 · OtherNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER+3 more: $165,000 · OtherNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $228,166 · Arts & CultureUCLA FOUNDATION: $106,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $50,000 · EducationPROJECT INCLUDE: $80,950 · EmploymentUNITED STATES WOMEN'S NATIONAL SOCCER TEAM PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION: $75,000 · EmploymentPANORAMA GLOBAL: $100,000 · InternationalINSIGHT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 · Community ImprovementWOMEN'S FUND OF HAWAI'I: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$7,564,855Arts & Culture$228,166Education$156,500Employment$155,950International$100,000Community Improvement$50,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $7,399,855 over 5y, 15% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC: $228,166 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $106,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT INCLUDE: $80,950 over 1y, 26% of budgetUNITED STATES WOMEN'S NATIONAL SOCCER TEAM PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION: $75,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetINSIGHT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF HAWAI'I: $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Time's Up Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Time's Up Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $824k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Time's Up’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home