Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Time's Up Foundation

The TIME'S UP FOUNDATION insists upon safe, fair, and dignified work for all by changing culture, companies, and laws.

$1.7M
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2022.

Crime & Legal$7.4MEmployment$341kArts & Culture$228kEducation$107kRecreation & Sports$75kHealth$55kCommunity Improvement$50kHuman Services$25k
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,700,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER$1,700,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Insight Center for Community Economic Development: $50k → 10%UNITED STATES WOMENS NATIONAL SOCCER TEAM PLAYERS ASSO: $75k → 10%THE UCLA FOUNDATION: $107k → 14%National Employment Law Project: $50k → 17%New York Foundation for the Arts: $228k → 20%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $1.7M → 14%Panorama Global: $100k → 9%The Regents of the University of California: $60k → 10%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $3.0M → 14%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $1.9M → 14%National Women's Law Center: $603k → 14%NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER: $133k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women in Product

Our mission is to equip women and non-binary folks to thrive in product management careers at all levels. we want all people to have equitable opportunities to build rewarding careers and shape the products of the future.

Human Services
2
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education
3
Women Employed

To improve the economic status of women and remove barriers to economic equity.

Employment
4
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
5
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
6
American Association of University Women Inc

Aauw advances gender equity for women and girls through research, education, and advocacy.

Education
7
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women and girls in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
9
Washington Women's Foundation

Washington women's foundation is a strong and inclusive collective of informed women who together influence community transformation through individual and collective discovery, high-impact grant making and by listening to and respecting…

Philanthropy
10
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
11
Women's Business Enterprise National Council

Wbenc's mission is to fuel economic growth globally by identifying, certifying, and facilitating the development of women-owned businesses.

Civil Rights
12
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Foundation for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Include. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $7,399,855 · OtherNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER+3 more — $165,000 · OtherNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $228,166 · Arts & CultureUCLA FOUNDATION — $106,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $50,000 · EducationPROJECT INCLUDE — $80,950 · EmploymentUNITED STATES WOMEN'S NATIONAL SOCCER TEAM PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION — $75,000 · EmploymentPANORAMA GLOBAL — $100,000 · InternationalINSIGHT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $50,000 · Community ImprovementWOMEN'S FUND OF HAWAI'I — $25,000 · Human Services
Other$7,564,855Arts & Culture$228,166Education$156,500Employment$155,950International$100,000Community Improvement$50,000Human Services$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $7,399,855 over 5y, 15% of budgetNEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $228,166 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $106,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT INCLUDE — $80,950 over 1y, 26% of budgetUNITED STATES WOMEN'S NATIONAL SOCCER TEAM PLAYERS' ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetINSIGHT CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF HAWAI'I — $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Time's Up Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $824k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines