· Private foundation
Tiger Hl Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $303k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH | $130,500 |
| KEREN MUGEIN IMOISHEYA | $64,300 |
| THE OJC FUND | $58,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| CONGREGATION BETH SHLOIME OF STATEN | $25,000 |
| MEVAKSHEI TORAH | $23,000 |
| THE FRISCH SCHOOL | $22,500 |
| PLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD | $12,691 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| BONEIOLAM | $4,500 |
| TALMUD TORAH TZOIN YOSEF PUPA INC | $3,500 |
| CONGREGATION BEER MAYIM | $1,150 |
| EMUNAH VCHESSED INC | $1,000 |
| MIKVEH KEHILAS YAKOV PUPA | $240 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +304% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.
24 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2021–2022 · $669k
- CMCONGREGATION MEOR HATFILAH3× · 2023–2025 · $396k
- KMKEREN MUGEIN IMOISHEYA2× · 2024–2025 · $176k
Funded once
- YMYESHIVA MESIVTA ARUGATH HABOSEMone grant, 2024 · $157k
- YAYESHIVAH AND MESIVTA AGUDAH HABOSEMone grant, 2023 · $110k
- MRMIKVAH RAMOUone grant, 2024 · $95k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
How this is measured
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Issachar & Miriam Bistritzky Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · Mazal Charitable Trust · M & M Fischer Foundation · Rockstone · Chaim Maleh Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation · Chayim V Chesed · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Tiger Hl Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tiger Hl Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Frisch School: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Tiger Hl’s filings →