Skip to content
Tifferet Moshe Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tifferet Moshe Inc

Research and study of the talmud and jewish code of law.

$686k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$735kEducation$189k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $106,514, the rows itemized in this filing. The $686,384 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $579,870 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $78k
$12,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$644k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAYEI OLAM$18,100
THE JEWISH BENEVOLENT SOCIETY$18,050
Individual grant recipient$15,000
YESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH$14,400
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL$12,300
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETANYA$8,500
MESIVTA OF LAKEWOOD NJ CENTER FOR JUDAIC STUDIES$7,500
BAIS REUVEN KAMINETZ$6,414
YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM$6,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ZICHRON ELIEZER SHALOM: $9k → 11%ZICHRON ELIEZER SHALOM: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$839k · 22 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$839k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+108%

Still filing today

55%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD
    5× · 2017–2022 · $64k · revenue +60%
  • YC
    YESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $52k · revenue +41%
  • YO
    YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • YT
    YESHIVA TIFERES SHMUEL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $51k
  • SC
    SHIRAS CHAIM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
2
Bais Yaakov Girls High School of Minneapolis

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Bais Yaakov Ohel Esther Inc

Operation of an educational institution for preschool and elementary school-aged children, providing both religous and secular education.

—
5
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
6
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
7
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
8
Yeshiva Shaarei Oorah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for high school aged students

Religion
9
Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School

To provide academic excellence in both limudei kodesh and secular studies.

—
10
Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc

Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Zichron Eliezer Shalom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
16/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH BENEVOLENT SOCIETY: $119,551 · OtherTHE JEWISH BENEVOLENT SOCIETYBAIS RIVKA ROCHEL INC: $113,345 · OtherBAIS RIVKA ROCHEL INCIndividual grant recipient: $54,438 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA TIFERES SHMUEL: $51,194 · OtherYESHIVA TIFERES SHMUELCONG BNOS DEVORAH INC: $33,501 · OtherCONG BNOS DEVORAH INCCONGREGATION DAMESEK ELIEZER: $28,551 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $28,038 · OtherNEW JERSEY CENTER FOR JUDAIC STUDIES: $27,788 · OtherCONGREGATION YESHIVA OHR HAMEIR: $26,765 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETANYA INC: $20,500 · Other+10 more: $47,230 · Other+10 moreCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $63,748 · EducationCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOODYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $52,163 · EducationYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAMYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $46,558 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INCBAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD: $45,048 · EducationBAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOODYESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH INC: $43,963 · EducationYESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH INCBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $40,665 · EducationBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood IncBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $35,477 · EducationBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INCCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $14,540 · Education+3 more: $13,085 · EducationZICHRON ELIEZER SHALOM INC: $10,460 · Human ServicesTORAS CHESED INC: $6,500 · ReligionYESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC: $960 · ReligionAGUDAH CAMPS INC: $350 · Religion
Other$550,901Education$355,247Human Services$10,460Religion$7,810

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $63,748 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM: $52,163 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $46,558 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD: $45,048 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH INC: $43,963 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc: $40,665 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $35,477 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETANYA INC: $20,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $14,540 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON ELIEZER SHALOM INC: $10,460 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetADERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $4,920 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC: $960 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $665 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA CHAYEI OLAM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS REUVEN KAMENETZ OF LAKEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA NACHLEI TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov High School of Lakewood Inc ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETANYA INC ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds ZICHRON ELIEZER SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA KEREN ORAH ↗
  • Who funds TORAS CHESED INC ↗
  • Who funds ADERES BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH KEREN HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDAH CAMPS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundDonors Fund IncJewish Communal FundToras Chesed IncJewish Community Foun…Jewish Federation of …Zichron Btz Tzedakah …National Society for …Jack Adjmi Family Fou…Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh …David Rosenbaum Famil…Joe & Eileen Sutton F…
The Ojc FundNY43.3× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Toras Chesed Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Joe & Eileen Sutton Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tifferet Moshe Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tifferet Moshe Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Chayei Olam: 10% of income from government
  • Mesivta Keren Orah: 10% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nachlei Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Gedolah Keren Hatorah Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tifferet Moshe Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tifferet Moshe Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tifferet Moshe’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home