Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shared Future Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$463k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$190k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Community Improvement$1.2MCivil Rights$312kEducation$275kYouth Development$45kArts & Culture$34kRecreation & Sports$10kEnvironment$3kAnimals$1k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $390k
$27,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOIL & SOUL INC$190,000
DELRAY BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$125,000
WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC$75,000
SOIL & SOUL INC$27,000
SUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC$25,000
EMANUEL JACKSON SR PROJECT INC$10,000
EMANUEL JACKSON SR PROJECT INC$10,000
DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMANUEL JACKSON SR PROJECT INC: $10k → 11%CAMPOUT FOR KIDS: $10k → 14%EMANUEL JACKSON SR PROJECT INC: $10k → 11%SOIL & SOUL INC: $95k → 11%WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $455k → 11%WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $300k → 11%WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $200k → 11%SOIL & SOUL INC: $190k → 11%DELRAY BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $125k → 11%WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $75k → 11%SOIL & SOUL INC: $27k → 11%WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC: $26k → 11%SUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC: $25k → 11%EMANUEL JACKSON SR PROJECT INC: $13k → 11%EMANUEL JACKSON SR PROJECT INC: $10k → 11%SUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC: $9k → 11%COMMUNITY GREENING CORP: $3k → 11%EMANUEL JACKSON SR PROJECT INC: $3k → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $200k → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 11%FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 11%DEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 15% of Shared Future Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Shared Future Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 5 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+360%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationCivil RightsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +139% · 98% of their budget
  • SS
    Soil & Soul Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $312k · revenue +57% · 43% of their budget
  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $275k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CO
    CAMP OUT FOR KIDS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • CG
    Community Greening Corpgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +360%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Future Forestry Corporation

Rebuild forest canopy to create ecosystems needed for native plants and animals to thrive in the cape coral, fl area.

Environment
2
Creative Kids Srq
Arts & Culture
3
Palm Beach County Surfing History Project Inc
4
Deerfield Beach Family Empowerment Inc

To Assist the City of Deerfield Housing Autority and its affilaiates in developing low income housing in Deerfield community

5
Friends of Deerfield Island Park Inc

Education and conservation

Environment
6
Florida Surveying and Mapping Society Scholarship Fund Inc
7
Dade County Senior Citizens Center
Human Services
8
Natureconnect Florida Inc
Environment
9
Na 'Aina Kai Botanical Gardens
Philanthropy
10
Miami-Dade Coastal Cleanup Inc

VolunteerCleanup.org is building a grassroots movement against marine debris by facilitating impactful and educational shoreline, waterways and neighborhood cleanups. By mobilizing people to participate in these cleanups, we aim to raise…

Environment
11
Florida Three Rivers Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc
Environment
12
Seeds of the Beloved Community
Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emanuel Jackson Senior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sunflower Creative Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC — $1,056,000 · Community ImprovementWEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INCDELRAY BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $125,000 · Community ImprovementDELRAY BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONSoil & Soul Inc — $312,000 · Civil RightsSoil & Soul IncFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 · EducationFLORIDA ATLANTIC…EMANUEL JACKSON SENIOR PROJECT INC — $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentSUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC — $33,500 · Arts & CultureCAMP OUT FOR KIDS — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsCommunity Greening Corp — $2,500 · EnvironmentDEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,000 · Animals
Community Improvement$1,181,000Civil Rights$312,000Education$275,000Youth Development$45,000Arts & Culture$33,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$2,500Animals$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST ATLANTIC REDEVELOPMENT COALITION INC — $1,056,000 over 5y, 98% of budgetSoil & Soul Inc — $312,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $275,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDELRAY BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $125,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetEMANUEL JACKSON SENIOR PROJECT INC — $45,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC — $33,500 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCAMP OUT FOR KIDS — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCommunity Greening Corp — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDEZZYS SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties IncFL17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Palm Healthcare Foundation Inc · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shared Future Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Community Greening Corp5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph