Skip to content
Thompson Thrift Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Thompson Thrift Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$919kReligion$554kHealth$394kInternational$203kEnvironment$177kEducation$151kHousing & Shelter$150kCivil Rights$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $608k
  • $250k+1 grant · $285k
$7,500
Median grant
17
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIES$285,430
NEXT STEP FOUNDATION INC$156,000
TURNING POINT USA INC$100,000
1792 EXCHANGE$100,000
HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES$75,000
BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA$75,000
EMPATHY & COMPASSION$52,000
HEART FOR LEBANON FOUNDATION$50,000
CROSSROADS CARE CLINIC$35,000
SKILLED KNOWLEDEABLE YOUTH$33,000
NEW STORY INC$25,000
CHAMPION MINISTRIES INC DBA GROUNDWIRE$25,000
LIFEPOINT CHURCH INDY INC$25,000
EASTSIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC$25,000
SAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $947k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RELIANT FOUNDATION: $3k → 8%OUTREACH INC: $4k → 14%HEART FOR LEBANON FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%A FRIENDS HOUSE INC: $2k → 8%NEW STORY INC: $25k → 14%TESSA: $2k → 9%HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES: $461k → 16%HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES: $280k → 16%HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES: $75k → 16%HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES: $40k → 16%CAMP NAVIGATE INC: $3k → 19%CAMP NAVIGATE INC: $3k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
OR
IN
OH
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
KS
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$666k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$2.3M
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

73%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $519k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
    2× · 2024–2025 · $454k · revenue +16%
  • NS
    Next Step Foundation Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $196k · revenue +162%
  • AL
    Apartment Life Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $98k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • WH
    World Hope International Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -12%
  • VG
    VICENTE GUERRERO GENERA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $55k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Catalyst Trust of Indiana

To create a flexible give-grow-grant entity for making local missional investments to fund and facilitate transformative community ventures.

Philanthropy
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Catholic Charities Bloomington Inc

Catholic Charities Bloomington is committed to enhancing the availability of quality mental health services in the communities it serves. We do this through the delivery of professional mental health education and counseling on a sliding…

—
6
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc

Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.

—
9
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Crosswinds Inc

The mission statement of the organization is changing hearts and bringing hope to individuals, families, and communities.

Human Services
11
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
12
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Next Step Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/58
Grantees still filing
15/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC: $855,820 · Human ServicesHEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INCHeart for Lebanon Foundation: $50,000 · Human Services+7 more: $43,500 · Human ServicesThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $453,585 · PhilanthropyThe Rosser Foundat…+4 more: $15,500 · PhilanthropyTURNING POINT USA INC: $100,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCTHE ROSSER FOUNDATION - ICM: $84,500 · OtherTHE ROSSER FOUNDATION - ICMVICENTE GUERRERO GENERA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $55,000 · OtherVICENTE GUERRERO GENERA ELEME…VICENTE FUERRERO GENERA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherVICENTE FUERRERO GENERA ELEME…SKILLED KNOWLEDEABLE YOUTH: $38,600 · Other1792 Exchange: $100,000 · Other1792 ExchangeWorld Hope International Inc: $60,000 · OtherWorld Hope International Inc+34 more: $263,340 · Other+34 moreNext Step Foundation Inc: $195,575 · HealthNext Step F…CROSSROADS CARE CLINIC: $98,000 · HealthCROSSROADS …+5 more: $13,750 · HealthBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $175,000 · Animals+2 more: $4,000 · AnimalsEmpathy & Compassion: $140,000 · Community ImprovementApartment Life Inc: $98,000 · ReligionEastside Christian Academy Inc: $25,000 · Religion+1 more: $2,000 · Religion
Human Services$949,320Philanthropy$469,085Other$751,440Health$307,325Animals$179,000Community Improvement$140,000Religion$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART CHANGE MINISTRIES INC: $855,820 over 4y, 35% of budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $453,585 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNext Step Foundation Inc: $195,575 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $175,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEmpathy & Compassion: $140,000 over 3y, 68% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetApartment Life Inc: $98,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS CARE CLINIC: $98,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetWorld Hope International Inc: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHeart for Lebanon Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEastside Christian Academy Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetIndiana State University Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Lions Tribe Academy: $16,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetFederated Insurance Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCamp Navigate Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWABASH VALLEY YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $6,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORAM DEO ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR GLOBAL IMPACT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINDIANA WISH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN FOUNDATION OF INDIANA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetTerre Haute Symphony Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKeep Pensacola Beautiful Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMANES AND MIRACLES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE EDGAR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWabash Valley Habitat for Humanity: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCIRCLE CITY FELLOWS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPaws N Hooves: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetA FRIENDS HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG CAT HABITAT EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVELAND CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTESSA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT NEVER BROKEN INC: $1,290 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOOSIER SALON PATRONS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEPHERDS OF GRIFFIN BIKE PARK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING INITIATIVE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWABASH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncMax L Gibson & Jacque…Wabash Valley Communi…Hamilton County Commu…Lumina Foundation for…Centerpoint Energy Fo…Indiana Chemical Trus…United Way of the Wab…Servant FoundationHollie & Anna Oakley …Clara Fairbanks Found…Gregory L Gibson Char…
Lilly Endowment IncIN22.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Indiana Chemical Trust Tr Ua-Fdt 320006018 · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Servant Foundation · Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thompson Thrift Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thompson Thrift Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thompson Thrift’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home