Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Thomas Skelton Harrison Foundation

Fund research, study and other activity that promotes sound municipal government and finance in the city of philadelphia, and for work that promotes the general welfare of its inhabitants.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Public Benefit$335kCrime & Legal$159kArts & Culture$105kEducation$80kHuman Services$20kCivil Rights$10k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY$50,000
RESOLVE PHILLY$50,000
THE PHILA CITIZEN$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%CHILDREN FIRST (PCCY): $20k → 22%ESPERANZA: $8k → 22%ESPERANZA: $8k → 22%ESPERANZA: $7k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$609k · 9 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$609k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+55%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalArts & CultureCivil RightsEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $175k · revenue +70%
  • TP
    THE PHILADELPHIA CITIZEN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $155k · revenue +3%
  • PHILADELPHIA VIP INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $80k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CF
    Children First PAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +85%
  • WL
    WOMEN'S LAW PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +55%
  • PF
    PENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pennsylvanians for Fair Courts

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, and government programs to protect against judicial gerrymandering and other legislative barriers to fair courts, and to conduct research about and publicize the positions of elected…

2
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
3
Philadelphia Public Access Corporation

Phillycam provides transformative opportunities for people and communities to express themselves, to learn from each other, and to produce and share media reflective of the experiences of everyday people.

4
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
5
Philly Black Worker Project

) to lead and engage in campaigns that empower Black workers to advance our rights and improve job quality in key employment sectors

Civil Rights
6
Ballot Pa Action

Informed and educated the public and lawmakers about the benefits of including independent voters in Pennsylvania's primary elections.

Civil Rights
7
Amistad Law Project

Amistad law project's mission is to fight for the human rights of people in our community by providing free and low-cost legal services to philadelphians and those incarcerated in pennsylvania's prisons. additionally, we advocate for laws…

Crime & Legal
8
Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau

The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…

9
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
10
Philadelphia Mural Arts Advocates Inc

Mural arts - the city of philadelphia mural arts program unites artists and communities through a collaborative process rooted in the traditions of mural making, to create art that transforms public spaces and individual lives.

Arts & Culture
11
Police Athletic League of Philadelphia
Youth Development
12
Chamber of Commerce for Greater Philadephia

The chamber of commerce for greater philadelphia (the chamber) brings area businesses and civic leaders together to promote growth and create opportunity in our region. our members represent eleven counties, three states, and roughly…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children First Pa and the most unlike its peers is Heights Philadelphia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE PHILADELPHIA CITIZEN — $155,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILADELPHIA CITIZENWHYY INC — $60,000 · Arts & CultureWHYY INCCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMITTEE OF SEVENTY — $175,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE OF SEVENTYWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT — $10,000 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S LAW PROJECTPHILADELPHIA VIP INC — $80,000 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPHIA VIP INCSupport Center for Child Advocates — $30,000 · Crime & LegalSupport Center for Chil…PHILADELPHIA LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL EQUITY — $27,500 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPHIA LAWYERS FO…PENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS — $10,000 · Crime & LegalPENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODE…RESOLVE PHILADELPHIA INC — $50,000 · EducationRESOLVE PHIL…HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA — $30,000 · EducationHEIGHTS PHIL…Esperanza Immigration Legal Services — $21,500 · Human ServicesChildren First PA — $20,000 · Human ServicesFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Other
Arts & Culture$225,000Civil Rights$185,000Crime & Legal$147,500Education$80,000Human Services$41,500Other$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMITTEE OF SEVENTY — $175,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA CITIZEN — $155,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA VIP INC — $80,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetWHYY INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESOLVE PHILADELPHIA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSupport Center for Child Advocates — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA — $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL EQUITY — $27,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetEsperanza Immigration Legal Services — $21,500 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetChildren First PA — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPENNSYLVANIANS FOR MODERN COURTS — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Independence Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Independence Public Media of Philadelphia Inc · The Lenfest Institute for Journalism Special Asset Fund of Tpf · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Philadelphia Bar Foundation · Future Standard Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas Skelton Harrison Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Thomas Skelton Harrison Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Thomas Skelton Harrison Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph