Skip to content
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc

Thomas jefferson university hospitals, inc.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.8MScience & Tech$39kHuman Services$35kFood & Nutrition$30kCommunity Improvement$20kEducation$17kHousing & Shelter$10kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$23,163
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Magee Memorial Hosp for Convalescents$23,163
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $25k → 22%SOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $20k → 22%LGBT ELDER INITIATIVE: $15k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 9 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$6.0M
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+18%

Still filing today

44%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    The Magee Memorial Hospital for Convalescents
    5× · 2018–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +25%
  • VI
    VERSITI INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $103k · revenue +48%
  • VW
    VERSITI WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $51k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • MA
    METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -34%
  • TJ
    THE JERRY SEGAL CLASSICgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +86%
  • JH
    JEFFERSON HEALTH CORPORATION F/K/A ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -71%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
2
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Breastcancerorg

Our mission is to help people make sense of the complex medical and personal information about breast health and breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their lives.

Health
5
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
6
The American Association of Immunologists Inc

The american association of immunologists (aai) is an international association representing professionally trained scientists who conduct basic and clinical research on the biology of the immune system. aai is dedicated to advancing the…

Health
7
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
8
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
9
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
10
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
11
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
12
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jerry Segal Classic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED: $2,914,001 · OtherQUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATEDARAMARK: $1,215,597 · OtherARAMARK+8 more: $197,785 · OtherThe Magee Memorial Hospital for Convalescents: $1,500,488 · HealthThe Magee Memorial Hospital for …VERSITI INC: $103,233 · HealthVERSITI INC+7 more: $150,896 · Health+7 moreTHE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesLGBT ELDER INITIATIVE: $15,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionLazarex Cancer Foundation: $10,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $5,507 · EducationPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia: $7,500 · Youth Development
Other$4,327,383Health$1,754,617Human Services$60,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Education$15,507Youth Development$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Magee Memorial Hospital for Convalescents: $1,500,488 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetVERSITI INC: $103,233 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $50,734 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $41,100 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $25,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetJEFFERSON HEALTH CORPORATION F/K/A ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLGBT ELDER INITIATIVE: $15,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetLazarex Cancer Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW JERSEY BLACK ISSUES CONVENTION: $10,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,062 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $5,507 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home