Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thomas D Halaczkiewicz Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Animals$206kEnvironment$90kArts & Culture$53kPhilanthropy$10kEducation$3k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $66k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM$20,000
THE SPCA FOR MONTEREY COUNTY$20,000
CARMEL DANCE FESTIVAL$16,017
SNIP SPAY AND NEUTER$10,000
HENRY MILLER LIBRARY$5,000
ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT$5,000
GOLDEN OLDIES CAT RESCUE$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $5k → 12%ANIMAL FRIENDS RESCUE PROJECT: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$349k · 7 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +134% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$349k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
0%

Still filing today

86%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County
    6× · 2019–2024 · $120k · revenue +78%
  • MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $90k · revenue +134%
  • CD
    CARMEL DANCE FESTIVAL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $43k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of the Carmel Valley Library
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • MP
    MONTEREY PUBLIC LIBRARY
    one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
2
Mendocino Coast Humane Society

Caring for homeless animals, and finding homes for them through pet adoptions.

Animals
3
Santa Cruz Spca and Humane Society

The Santa Cruz SPCA provides safe harbor for animals in need and promotes an active humane community through adoption, advocacy, and education.

Animals
4
Monterey Museum of Art

The monterey museum of art cultivates curiosity in the visual arts and engages community with the diversity of california art - past, present, and future.

Arts & Culture
5
Monterey Bay United
Recreation & Sports
6
Friends of the Santa Cruz Public Libraries Inc

To provide support to the city-county library system through advocacy, volunteer services and fund raising. Their goal is to create stronger neighborhoods and a culturally-enriched county through accessible and diverse library programs.

Education
7
Carl Cherry Foundation

Founded by Carmel-by-the-sea artist Jeanne Dorge, the Carl Cherry Center for the Arts was established to help support experimental fine arts and projects in the sciences. Since its opening in 1948, the Center has strived to stay true to…

Arts & Culture
8
Casa Abrego Preservation Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Marin Friends of Ferals

Animal Rescue - Community Cats

Animals
10
Morro Bay Friends of the Library

Provide financial and volunteer support to our library and to the San Luis Obispo County Libraries including donations to the County Libraries for E-Books, Suggest a Book Program, and Books by Mail.

11
Monterey County Interfaith Alliance
12
Museum Foundation of Pacific Grove Inc

The Museum inspires wonder, discovery, and stewardship of our natural world. The Museum is a catalyst for conservation and a valued learning resource, facilitating active scientific and historical inquiry for all ages.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Monterey County and the most unlike its peers is Monterey Bay Aquarium Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County — $120,000 · AnimalsSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey CountyMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $90,000 · AnimalsMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATIONGOLDEN OLDIES CAT RESCUE — $11,625 · AnimalsSNIP SPAY AND NEUTER — $62,500 · OtherSNIP SPAY AND NEUTER+2 more — $3,249 · OtherCARMEL DANCE FESTIVAL — $43,383 · Arts & CultureCARMEL DANCE FES…Henry Miller Memorial Library — $10,000 · Arts & CultureHenry Miller Mem…Animal Friends Rescue Project — $11,624 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $10,354 · Philanthropy
Animals$221,625Other$65,749Arts & Culture$53,383Human Services$11,624Philanthropy$10,354

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County — $120,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEL DANCE FESTIVAL — $43,383 over 3y, 10% of budgetGOLDEN OLDIES CAT RESCUE — $11,625 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetAnimal Friends Rescue Project — $11,624 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY — $10,354 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHenry Miller Memorial Library — $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thomas D Halaczkiewicz Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph