Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Theresa & Edward O'Toole Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
58
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$8.6MEducation$5.1MHealth$2.7MHuman Services$1.4MHousing & Shelter$920kPublic Safety & Disaster$425kYouth Development$190kFood & Nutrition$164kOther$0
02FY2025 · 58 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k26 grants · $690k
  • $50k–250k28 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO$500,000
MYSTICAL HUMANITY OF CHRIST$500,000
ALL CATHOLIC STUDIOS$300,000
CARMEL OF JESUS MARY JOSEPH$250,000
COMM FOR MISSION RESP OF ARCHDIOCESE NY$220,000
ST PATRICKS SEMINARY$160,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL LOS ANGEL$150,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$150,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES BUREAU INC$150,000
SAINT PETERS UNIVERSITY$130,000
MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES$125,000
XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND$120,000
PROVIDENCE REST HOME$120,000
ROSARY HILL HOME$120,000
SISTERS OF ST FRANCES$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $50k → 11%RISE UP INDUSTRIES: $50k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
MD
DE
NM
SC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 55 repeat orgs$6.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
60

Total granted

$15M
$4.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
0%

Still filing today

27%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MYSTICAL HUMANITY OF CHRIST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +18% · 93% of their budget
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
    3× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +32%
  • XS
    XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND
    6× · 2020–2025 · $800k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PETER CLAVER ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $450k
  • PR
    PROVIDENCE REST
    one grant, 2024 · $300k · revenue 0%
  • SJ
    ST JOACHIM CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $300k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
St John's University New York

St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education (continued on schedule o).

Education
5
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
St Francis Hospital

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

11
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

12
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Dominic's Family Services (Formerly Saint Dominic's Home) and the most unlike its peers is Deep Adventure Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsSenior Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%63%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%25%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%1%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%61%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/72
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,493

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 144 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
18/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND — $800,000 · OtherST PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $750,000 · OtherROSARY HILL HOME — $720,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE REST HOME — $580,770 · Other+120 more — $11,243,000 · Other+120 moreTHE MYSTICAL HUMANITY OF CHRIST — $2,000,000 · ReligionTHE MYSTICAL HUM…ALL CATHOLIC STUDIOS — $1,050,000 · ReligionALL CATHOLIC STU…+2 more — $85,800 · ReligionPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $1,300,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-…SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH — $230,000 · EducationSAN MIGUEL…THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $200,000 · EducationTHE CATHOL…SAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $130,000 · EducationSAINT PETE…St John's University — $100,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE REST — $300,000 · HealthGREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · HealthST IGNATIUS NURSING & REHAB CENTER — $50,000 · HealthTRINITAS FOUNDATION — $45,000 · HealthMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC — $270,000 · InternationalRise Up Industries — $100,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE — $25,000 · Human ServicesST CHRISTOPHER'S INN INC — $80,000 · Housing & ShelterLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterNAZARETH HOUSING INC — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$15,243,770Religion$3,135,800Education$1,960,000Health$455,000International$270,000Human Services$125,000Housing & Shelter$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MYSTICAL HUMANITY OF CHRIST — $2,000,000 over 6y, 93% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $1,300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL CATHOLIC STUDIOS — $1,050,000 over 3y, 66% of budgetXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND — $800,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO — $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE — $375,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPROVIDENCE REST — $300,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC — $270,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH — $230,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEEP ADVENTURE MINISTRIES INC — $200,000 over 2y, 96% of budgetSAINT DOMINIC'S FAMILY SERVICES (FORMERLY SAINT DOMINIC'S HOME) — $155,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD — $145,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC — $140,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY — $130,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRise Up Industries — $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLESTONNAC FREE CLINIC — $100,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE LEO HOUSE FOR GERMAN CATHOLIC EMIGRANTS — $100,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCatholic Community Foundation of Long Island Inc — $65,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetTHE CROSSROADS FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetVILLA THERESE CATHOLIC CLINIC SISTERS OF CIINCINNATI — $60,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetGREATER NEW YORK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSt Johns Bread & Life Program Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetST IGNATIUS NURSING & REHAB CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC GUARDIAN SERVICES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLittle Servant Sisters — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRINITAS FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFDNY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOur Sunday Visitor Inc — $20,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAZARETH HOUSING INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMARGARET ANNA CUSACK CARE CENTER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KOINONIA ACADEMY — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MYSTICAL HUMANITY OF CHRIST
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
  • Who funds ALL CATHOLIC STUDIOS
  • Who funds XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE REST
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA
  • Who funds DEEP ADVENTURE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds SAINT DOMINIC'S FAMILY SERVICES (FORMERLY SAINT DOMINIC'S HOME)
  • Who funds ST ELIZABETH SETON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION LTD
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC
  • Who funds SAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ30.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Koch Foundation Inc · Mutual of America Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Brooklyn Benevolent Society · Hugoton Foundation · Ej Grassmann Trust · Al & Peggy Dematteis Family Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Michael Gordon Foundation Inc · Union Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Theresa & Edward O'Toole Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Little Servant Sisters8% of income from government
  • Little Sisters of the Poor Inc5% of income from government
  • Saint Peter's University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 144 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph